MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH2CxRASFOfSxAp4a-6N8CcQipwQA1qn7kk0-98LeV1wCKfREw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB372428A25E1F42A@DS04>
	<55D1C81D.4070402@olivere.de>
	<CAEz79PrqhSOJzTNWRDv5UfRJa1-f=1OE_pDs0vtHazHso1_5pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D24625.40806@olivere.de>
	<CAEz79PoMgax-Jk1UYP82XzK13r=-e7mgSvpsDE1h4bOATZbKCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D38025.4030605@olivere.de>
	<CAH2CxRASFOfSxAp4a-6N8CcQipwQA1qn7kk0-98LeV1wCKfREw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:03:53 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKzdR-oABTSE_rxi0PgdzKMeZXp1A2+e8RrWvufM+euMOOJLXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anon Moto <daggerhashimoto@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113de1de1a766b051d9f9ef0
Cc: Arnoud Kouwenhoven - Pukaki Corp via bitcoin-dev
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
Precedence: list

--001a113de1de1a766b051d9f9ef0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Just to add some superfluous and unessential spice to this discussion,
there were two Satoshi users originally registered in sourceforge, one
registered very soon after the other. So I say Satoshi were at least two
people, so it may be the case that one Satoshi re-appeared, but the other
did not.

Ore maybe one Satoshi is for Bitcoin XT, and the other Satoshi is against
it.

Satoshi wars!


On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Anon Moto via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> And this is how the powers that be compromise bitcoin. They can't stop
> TCP/IP, but they sure can take over the development team. It's a good thing
> that no one from the CIA has had any conversations with anyone from the
> bitcoin development team. Phew...
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Am 18.08.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:
>> > I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense that you
>> > are suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted to be
>> > active in development again?
>>
>> Who am I? Personally I have zero objection if the creator steps in. I
>> think he would be highly welcome by the most people. At first I had the
>> impression that the email was a fake, but maybe I was wrong. At the
>> moment I think: Maybe it's even the best if we do not know exactly
>> whether it was Satoshi or not.
>>
>> Unanimity is mission critical for Bitcoin and must be an absolute
>> priority. If not the vast majority is in favor for a fork, then the fork
>> should be avoided until a consensus is found. Even if it takes until the
>> cows come home.
>>
>> But it is very likely now that it will come to a fork. No matter which
>> site will win, this will produce a lot of humiliated people at the end.
>> That's not good and leads to bitterness on both sites.
>>
>> - oliver
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>

--001a113de1de1a766b051d9f9ef0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Just to add some superfluous and unessential spice to this=
 discussion, there were two Satoshi users originally registered in sourcefo=
rge, one registered very soon after the other. So I say Satoshi were at lea=
st two people, so it may be the case that one Satoshi re-appeared, but the =
other did not.=C2=A0<div><br><div>Ore maybe one Satoshi is for Bitcoin XT, =
and the other Satoshi is against it.</div><div><br></div><div>Satoshi wars!=
<br><div><br></div></div></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Anon Moto via bitcoin-=
dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundati=
on.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</sp=
an> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;=
border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">And this is h=
ow the powers that be compromise bitcoin. They can&#39;t stop TCP/IP, but t=
hey sure can take over the development team. It&#39;s a good thing that no =
one from the CIA has had any conversations with anyone from the bitcoin dev=
elopment team. Phew...<br><br></div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"=
><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 18, =
2015 at 11:57 AM, Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bit=
coin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pa=
dding-left:1ex"><span>Am 18.08.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:<br>
&gt; I honestly don&#39;t understand your position, but I get the sense tha=
t you<br>
&gt; are suggesting Satoshi wouldn&#39;t be welcome to return if he wanted =
to be<br>
&gt; active in development again?<br>
<br>
</span>Who am I? Personally I have zero objection if the creator steps in. =
I<br>
think he would be highly welcome by the most people. At first I had the<br>
impression that the email was a fake, but maybe I was wrong. At the<br>
moment I think: Maybe it&#39;s even the best if we do not know exactly<br>
whether it was Satoshi or not.<br>
<br>
Unanimity is mission critical for Bitcoin and must be an absolute<br>
priority. If not the vast majority is in favor for a fork, then the fork<br=
>
should be avoided until a consensus is found. Even if it takes until the<br=
>
cows come home.<br>
<br>
But it is very likely now that it will come to a fork. No matter which<br>
site will win, this will produce a lot of humiliated people at the end.<br>
That&#39;s not good and leads to bitterness on both sites.<br>
<div><div><br>
- oliver<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a113de1de1a766b051d9f9ef0--