Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1XCnjV-0005yu-9c
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:37:13 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.219.53 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.219.53; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-oa0-f53.google.com; 
Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.219.53])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1XCnjU-0007cQ-B5
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:37:13 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j17so1808462oag.26
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 03:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.158.8 with SMTP id wq8mr15471693oeb.40.1406803025028;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 03:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.35.234 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 03:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH+ZByEFqBmUvA_ZO_8MzaYvfUopHY1x=rGaMeq8fL4_2q1uJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJHLa0O1EP8aUn4KLbo3OvzjgVfF8onrMjNnkRAnuWHwbofWBQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+s+GJDUbm7Z9FeQr1otuEPXn0RRq+KL=kS3GJT3j3TeWz_n5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBhmkcW-7TYQ7TxAYvMsLrckcja+wPDow80a9Yoo1KdgMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH+ZByEFqBmUvA_ZO_8MzaYvfUopHY1x=rGaMeq8fL4_2q1uJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:37:04 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: _ohfLw4b5Gpsa-H49JkcBVM7O64
Message-ID: <CANEZrP2HHPUnsymDnRLd=-Ox-RD8RezM7TvpYeAw_np4JM4Bdw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Neil Fincham <neil@asdf.co.nz>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6ac48936d4804ff7adaed
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1XCnjU-0007cQ-B5
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Abusive and broken bitcoin seeders
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:37:13 -0000

--047d7bd6ac48936d4804ff7adaed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
> I suspect it is something that is going to have to be dealt with in the
> future (I just don't know how yet).
>

The web has managed to survive despite constant fast crawls being the norm
for the past 10 years or so. I wouldn't worry too much about this unless
you can prove that a big chunk of your nodes resources are going to
answering ver queries.

--047d7bd6ac48936d4804ff7adaed
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I suspect it is something =
that is going to have to be dealt with in the future (I just don&#39;t know=
 how yet).=C2=A0</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The web has managed to survive despi=
te constant fast crawls being the norm for the past 10 years or so. I would=
n&#39;t worry too much about this unless you can prove that a big chunk of =
your nodes resources are going to answering ver queries.=C2=A0</div>
</div></div></div>

--047d7bd6ac48936d4804ff7adaed--