Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97DB8EC8
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:52:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com
	[209.85.223.180])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 368831F8
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:52:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iods203 with SMTP id s203so71771294iod.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:content-type; bh=U9nRDQftjxSN+M4Dg6VSma/3w9DZ8YaU2q10I6j4VYo=;
	b=KOS3wmrurSvxz4i2lf+EFnMeYQLp0+u5ZudsWmKEYf7oYPSFppH/Ou1slF/fuZ0xH+
	tfZTgH+zxANxJGkTbXbQmbNz2zCWeyEblHkD0iiPCbTSzBBjQUQ91ErKFY3WWkZsD2Ez
	AWxC1XAKYgVWa8ijnV/t1jrsL4R44Umt1tcQF1dpk2zrqoM2fQkiRRoB40CPKeZ6E76T
	Q5v3z9U5i6dlbix/4Fj0GKbpd7XNYlK6tihyCWf7GZ8vuAlqAKyCf2nZ/MbbxS6x5PLB
	kurWO7brSsFrYiUOps13SoBenglKDUpgLwPCUSnopwQiFZH8QdcCzAeXRQTKLrHnRyOo
	3+LQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.132.146 with SMTP id o18mr11203314ioi.134.1440708724609; 
	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABr1YTcoWesaBJaT--bbUUN-c2phc-=3ieWT7vVDNPGg0iHH2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABr1YTc=aXS4V8gO3cmKrrinFv5BO-3Dpo+TRmSWcd-ed=JdLA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABr1YTc=aXS4V8gO3cmKrrinFv5BO-3Dpo+TRmSWcd-ed=JdLA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:51:55 +0000
Message-ID: <CABr1YTffo1m6U0DsT1vvoKzcLsnufUnwA8Lo6ipVuhjyoqjMEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f33cac15c45051e5123c4
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Splitting BIPs
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:52:06 -0000

--001a113f33cac15c45051e5123c4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I posted a new draft of the proposal:
http://blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html

The subsections still need to be fleshed out a bit more. I'd love any
comments or suggestions.

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 4:30 PM Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, the current "type" attribute needs modification. There are different
> degrees of "standard". Just because a lot of people do X doesn't need to
> mean that doing X is "officially" endorsed by any other devs. At most
> levels below 1, disagreements might be entirely tolerable for many things.
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 2:06 PM Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Seems like a lot of effort and goodwill is being wasted on contention
>> over things we don't really need to agree upon. In order to help us better
>> prioritize, I propose adding an extra attribute to BIPs indicating their
>> "level" which is split into five as follows:
>>
>> 1. Consensus (hard/soft fork)
>> 2. Peer Services
>> 3. RPC
>> 4. Implementations
>> 5. Applications
>>
>> I posted an example of what such a table might look like here: http://
>> blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html
>>
>> If other folks also think this is a good idea I'll start working on a BIP
>> draft for this.
>>
>

--001a113f33cac15c45051e5123c4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">I posted a new draft of the proposal: <a href=3D"http://bloc=
khawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html">http://blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwik=
i.html</a></p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">The subsections still need to be fleshed out a bit more. I&#=
39;d love any comments or suggestions.<br>
</p>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 4:30 =
PM=C2=A0Eric Lombrozo &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:elombrozo@gmail.com">elombrozo@=
gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir=
=3D"ltr">Also, the current &quot;type&quot; attribute needs modification. T=
here are different degrees of &quot;standard&quot;. Just because a lot of p=
eople do X doesn&#39;t need to mean that doing X is &quot;officially&quot; =
endorsed by any other devs. At most levels below 1, disagreements might be =
entirely tolerable for many things.<br>
</p>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 2:06 =
PM=C2=A0Eric Lombrozo &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:elombrozo@gmail.com" target=3D"=
_blank">elombrozo@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gm=
ail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-le=
ft:1ex"><p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
Seems like a lot of effort and goodwill is being wasted on contention over =
things we don&#39;t really need to agree upon. In order to help us better p=
rioritize, I propose adding an extra attribute to BIPs indicating their &qu=
ot;level&quot; which is split into five as follows:</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">1. Consensus (hard/soft fork)<br>
2. Peer Services<br>
3. RPC<br>
4. Implementations<br>
5. Applications</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I posted an example of what such a table might look like her=
e: http://<a href=3D"http://blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html" target=
=3D"_blank">blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html</a></p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">If other folks also think this is a good idea I&#39;ll start=
 working on a BIP draft for this.</p>
</blockquote></div></blockquote></div>

--001a113f33cac15c45051e5123c4--