Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97DB8EC8 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:52:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 368831F8 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iods203 with SMTP id s203so71771294iod.0 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:52:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=U9nRDQftjxSN+M4Dg6VSma/3w9DZ8YaU2q10I6j4VYo=; b=KOS3wmrurSvxz4i2lf+EFnMeYQLp0+u5ZudsWmKEYf7oYPSFppH/Ou1slF/fuZ0xH+ tfZTgH+zxANxJGkTbXbQmbNz2zCWeyEblHkD0iiPCbTSzBBjQUQ91ErKFY3WWkZsD2Ez AWxC1XAKYgVWa8ijnV/t1jrsL4R44Umt1tcQF1dpk2zrqoM2fQkiRRoB40CPKeZ6E76T Q5v3z9U5i6dlbix/4Fj0GKbpd7XNYlK6tihyCWf7GZ8vuAlqAKyCf2nZ/MbbxS6x5PLB kurWO7brSsFrYiUOps13SoBenglKDUpgLwPCUSnopwQiFZH8QdcCzAeXRQTKLrHnRyOo 3+LQ== X-Received: by 10.107.132.146 with SMTP id o18mr11203314ioi.134.1440708724609; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:52:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CABr1YTcoWesaBJaT--bbUUN-c2phc-=3ieWT7vVDNPGg0iHH2g@mail.gmail.com> <CABr1YTc=aXS4V8gO3cmKrrinFv5BO-3Dpo+TRmSWcd-ed=JdLA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CABr1YTc=aXS4V8gO3cmKrrinFv5BO-3Dpo+TRmSWcd-ed=JdLA@mail.gmail.com> From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:51:55 +0000 Message-ID: <CABr1YTffo1m6U0DsT1vvoKzcLsnufUnwA8Lo6ipVuhjyoqjMEA@mail.gmail.com> To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f33cac15c45051e5123c4 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Splitting BIPs X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:52:06 -0000 --001a113f33cac15c45051e5123c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I posted a new draft of the proposal: http://blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html The subsections still need to be fleshed out a bit more. I'd love any comments or suggestions. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 4:30 PM Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, the current "type" attribute needs modification. There are different > degrees of "standard". Just because a lot of people do X doesn't need to > mean that doing X is "officially" endorsed by any other devs. At most > levels below 1, disagreements might be entirely tolerable for many things. > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 2:06 PM Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Seems like a lot of effort and goodwill is being wasted on contention >> over things we don't really need to agree upon. In order to help us better >> prioritize, I propose adding an extra attribute to BIPs indicating their >> "level" which is split into five as follows: >> >> 1. Consensus (hard/soft fork) >> 2. Peer Services >> 3. RPC >> 4. Implementations >> 5. Applications >> >> I posted an example of what such a table might look like here: http:// >> blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html >> >> If other folks also think this is a good idea I'll start working on a BIP >> draft for this. >> > --001a113f33cac15c45051e5123c4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <p dir=3D"ltr">I posted a new draft of the proposal: <a href=3D"http://bloc= khawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html">http://blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwik= i.html</a></p> <p dir=3D"ltr">The subsections still need to be fleshed out a bit more. I&#= 39;d love any comments or suggestions.<br> </p> <br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 4:30 = PM=C2=A0Eric Lombrozo <<a href=3D"mailto:elombrozo@gmail.com">elombrozo@= gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style= =3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir= =3D"ltr">Also, the current "type" attribute needs modification. T= here are different degrees of "standard". Just because a lot of p= eople do X doesn't need to mean that doing X is "officially" = endorsed by any other devs. At most levels below 1, disagreements might be = entirely tolerable for many things.<br> </p> <br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 2:06 = PM=C2=A0Eric Lombrozo <<a href=3D"mailto:elombrozo@gmail.com" target=3D"= _blank">elombrozo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gm= ail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-le= ft:1ex"><p dir=3D"ltr"><br> Seems like a lot of effort and goodwill is being wasted on contention over = things we don't really need to agree upon. In order to help us better p= rioritize, I propose adding an extra attribute to BIPs indicating their &qu= ot;level" which is split into five as follows:</p> <p dir=3D"ltr">1. Consensus (hard/soft fork)<br> 2. Peer Services<br> 3. RPC<br> 4. Implementations<br> 5. Applications</p> <p dir=3D"ltr">I posted an example of what such a table might look like her= e: http://<a href=3D"http://blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html" target= =3D"_blank">blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html</a></p> <p dir=3D"ltr">If other folks also think this is a good idea I'll start= working on a BIP draft for this.</p> </blockquote></div></blockquote></div> --001a113f33cac15c45051e5123c4--