Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
	designates 62.13.149.113 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=62.13.149.113; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
	helo=outmail149113.authsmtp.com; 
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:27:31 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@250bpm.com>
Message-ID: <20131023202731.GA31783@petertodd.org>
References: <791a727f-2188-4848-bd77-ea733c8c5c2c@me.com>
	<201310211947.59640.luke@dashjr.org> <52661DB7.7040805@250bpm.com>
	<FAE2A544-9295-4087-96DE-D4602D109CBD@me.com>
	<CAAS2fgS2f=gYRSr1n2DzK7CUH3xG3J2JMnDreCKBoCcJcpGLxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<52662AA1.5050509@250bpm.com>
	<CAJHLa0NDus+Ou5go8b_OHvjYW8f7oxXbpxnHTG3dcvxGR49nxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<52677CF7.9070609@250bpm.com>
	<20131023194039.GB31497@petertodd.org> <52682C24.30700@250bpm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52682C24.30700@250bpm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Revisiting the BIPS process, a proposal
Precedence: list


--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:05:56PM +0200, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> On 23/10/13 21:40, Peter Todd wrote:
>=20
> >The reference implementation is the specification - the "specification"
> >on the wiki is best thought of as a set of Coles Notes on the real
> >specification. If you don't already understand that and the nuance of
> >that statement you should assume the protocol is fixed in stone and
> >doesn't evolve at all; that statement is not quite true, but it's very
> >close to the truth.
>=20
> Does that imply that the notes are deliberately obscured to force
> everyone to check the source code?

What's on the wiki is mostly the work of people who aren't working on
the reference implementation, so no, you can't say that.

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000003c1d48b638b9857cb56b6fe9188a60c481fbc9b738ccb4663

--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSaDEzAAoJEBmcgzuo5/CFEUgH/3ba8xgBR8cqRW21T2084OBu
wupu5pPZBIGT2KfuoJDjRYyXngUitMIxtJbL52srt85EzJd4JpLEL5OI9T2Kg9Xm
0nLRpNy9xPHL7N6hpcBvLoxlPi04mx5M7lFYaBrZVOHd3+XdunUSVB/Dmj+bX6pO
uBaW6RdprSfD4tEf3h2TohSRPfsxXRf4jW+u8K6t5RUM0ofnk6X9zBRcPLl2p3Vx
ac4sg9FksjMNLMca4YylmwoRo00DZaRpRhtP53+xSB1lwJE/aJtYRTjwEbMs8XKN
IDYUjacDNroduKbBn9ilHByYBvtvqKUon8mb88oJyXRvXPrLnUZmTiCegCT/Or8=
=sP8l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD--