Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1X88bt-0001Rg-H8 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:54:05 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com designates 74.125.82.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.179; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com; helo=mail-we0-f179.google.com; Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1X88bs-0006Zy-Aw for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:54:05 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id u57so4552853wes.38 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:53:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=OheIrj5Lwsmxr/pXshnYUAsHZtDP5j7rVCs3D6H1CLE=; b=aOuJeytJmKIqgMj+vw3HIHYcgZD2osmQxAzgQoJCz+REjYiVBjdkgpZHod9JQKy+no LQOzQsCiTkyWO2OyvCNIh/Dmf8cd59N9rKvYSoc7mouRW1ch+s+fHwYGZGj+HoIrfUUh GmY+gUncw4D2bG3wTMvuj4Z5Sq+YMdPVDhX1RCtAw54WzVSSRFJ7iJ9yr4cZUjO3wMyX R3tDFhlUU3mwd326dTJaBsvCYVsSueokx/oZOXCaeXqCnZR5XQd296G/pLecDC2/50Pi BSvDqhypBGCP15OMc2gw8HYcFbRYjo/3VKcIPti9/1HpHBzDOGgEH2tc21uRwJ7Ayc2c 0z7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl657HG1y+bxlx0Xaoxq/Wf3eHCZuASj3vvMbTg3BBEODMR+9+H1QVpmqE+p7vrFKcpY1nS X-Received: by 10.180.24.97 with SMTP id t1mr32868753wif.45.1405691635961; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:53:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.5.67 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:53:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jeff Garzik Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:53:35 -0400 Message-ID: To: Gavin Andresen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1X88bs-0006Zy-Aw Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Squashing redundant tx data in blocks on the wire X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:54:05 -0000 On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > I'd encourage you to code up a prototype first (or at the same time), in > whatever programming language / networking library you're most familiar > with. +1 > Maybe not even using the existing p2p protocol; there could be a mining-only > very-fast-block-propagation network separate from the existing p2p network. > > Combining your optimizations with "broadcast as many near-miss blocks as > bandwidth will allow" on a mining backbone network should allow insanely > fast propagation of most newly solved blocks. Yes, I would encourage thinking along these lines. That was the motivation of the UDP P2P protocol extension I wrote: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=156769.0 The intention was to experiment with sending block header + tx list + coinbase, via UDP best effort broadcast. Incentives: If your neighbors receiving this message already have the TXs in the TX list, then the block is complete, and may be relayed further. If your neighbors do not have all TXs in the block, they must fetch them at additional time/latency cost. Thus, you have an incentive to relay blocks containing TXs already distributed out into network mempools and cached in the signature cache. We want to capture that incentive in whatever protocol is eventually used. Miners have a TX fee incentive to include many transactions. In theory, they want to include as many TX as possible. It will help us scale quite a bit to solve this problem.