Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1Sj4sA-0008N3-6h
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:42:14 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 74.125.82.41 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.41; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-wg0-f41.google.com; 
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Sj4s4-0003Qk-H2
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:42:14 +0000
Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so2461563wgb.4
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.20.239 with SMTP id q15mr22616699wie.13.1340613722352;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.254.232 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSWb2v6F2xbK0ZFNPz5cwgf6zwB8QbRYgyS1u8xmgAUTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANEZrP0nagdAXyMEY5yxyXBjdo78YC16mjUG9=b0AMe4qOS=fA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgSWb2v6F2xbK0ZFNPz5cwgf6zwB8QbRYgyS1u8xmgAUTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:42:02 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: S7e-X9R0nzttmArLw-j6plxABJI
Message-ID: <CANEZrP0QK3gGEz6qvWbQ17uv7rdch-u9Cs1U7itAh2a=MiNtDA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Sj4s4-0003Qk-H2
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Enforcing inflation rules for SPV clients
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:42:14 -0000

> Link?

It was a private conversation for some reason.

> I also proposed this on this list (see the response in the tree
> datastructures thread) along with more elaboration on IRC.

Ah OK. I wasn't paying much attention to those threads.