Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1W45eE-0001Xj-AL for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:23:30 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.170; envelope-from=natanael.l@gmail.com; helo=mail-we0-f170.google.com; Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com ([74.125.82.170]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1W45eC-00014J-LG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:23:30 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u57so4330616wes.15 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:23:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.160.166 with SMTP id xl6mr1202982wib.43.1389950602420; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:23:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.178.4 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:23:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.178.4 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:23:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20140113133746.GI38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> <20140114225321.GT38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> <20140116212805.GA4421@petertodd.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:23:22 +0100 Message-ID: From: Natanael To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b66f9cbe9aacc04f02717a4 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (natanael.l[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1W45eC-00014J-LG Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:23:30 -0000 --047d7b66f9cbe9aacc04f02717a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 So far I've only liked the original name "Stealth address" and the suggestion "routing address". Should we put this up for some kind of informal vote with comments allowed? Like a Google docs form? - Sent from my phone Den 17 jan 2014 10:18 skrev "Mike Hearn" : > I must say, this shed is mighty fine looking. It'd be a great place to > store our bikes. But, what colour should we paint it? > > How about we split the difference and go with "privacy address"? As Peter > notes, that's what people actually like and want. The problem with stealth > is it's got strong connotations with American military hardware and perhaps > thieves sneaking around in the night: > > https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=stealth > > But everyone loves privacy. > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Drak wrote: > >> Peter I agree with you about "reusable addresses", but aren't we also >> trying to get away from the word "address" entirely? How about calling it >> a "payment key" or "reusable payment key" instead? using "stealth" is just >> asking for bad press imo. >> >> >> On 16 January 2014 21:28, Peter Todd wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 04:05:27PM -0800, Jeremy Spilman wrote: >>> > Might I propose "reusable address". >>> > >>> > I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more >>> > so encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs >>> > 'reusable'. >>> > >>> > It definitely packs a marketing punch which could help drive >>> > adoption. The feature is only useful if/when broadly adopted. >>> >>> I'm very against the name "reusable addresses" and strongly belive we >>> should stick with the name stealth addresses. >>> >>> You gotta look at it from the perspective of a user; lets take standard >>> pay-to-pubkey-hash addresses: I can tell my wallet to pay one as many >>> times as I want and everything works just great. I also can enter the >>> address on blockchain.info's search box, and every transaction related >>> to the address, and the balance of it, pops up immediately. >>> >>> What is that telling me? A: Addresses starting with "1" are reusable. B: >>> Transactions associated with them appear to be public knowledge. >>> >>> Now I upgrade my wallet software and it says I now have a "reusable" >>> address. My reaction is "Huh? Normal addresses are reusable, what's >>> special about this weird reusable address thing that my buddy Bob's >>> wallet software couldn't pay." I might even try to enter in a "reusable" >>> address in blockchain.info, which won't work, and I'll just figure >>> "must be some new unsupported thing" and move on with my life. >>> >>> On the other hand, suppose my wallet says I now have "stealth address" >>> support. I'm going to think "Huh, stealth? I guess that means privacy >>> right? I like privacy." If I try searching for a stealth address on >>> blockchain.info, when it doesn't work I might think twig on "Oh right! >>> It said stealth addresses are private, so maybe the transactions are >>> hidden?" I might also think "Maybe this is like stealth/incognito mode >>> in my browser? So like, there's no history being kept for others to >>> see?" Regardless, I'm going to be thinking "well I hear scary stuff >>> about Bitcoin privacy, and this stealth thing sounds like it's gonna >>> help, so I should learn more about that" >>> >>> Finally keep in mind that stealth addresses have had a tonne of very >>> fast, and very wide reaching PR. The name is in the public conciousness >>> already, and trying to change it now just because of vague bad >>> associations is going to throw away the momentum of that good PR and >>> slow down adoption. Last night I was at the Toronto Bitcoin Meetup and I >>> based on conversations there with people there, technical and >>> non-technical, almost everyone had heard about them and almost everyone >>> seemed to understand the basic idea of why they were a good thing. That >>> just wouldn't have happened with a name that tried to hide what stealth >>> addresses were for, and by changing the name now we risk people not >>> making the connection when wallet software gets upgraded to support >>> them. >>> >>> -- >>> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org >>> 0000000000000001b0e0ae7ef97681ad77188030b6c791aef304947e6f524740 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >>> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >>> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >>> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >>> >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > --047d7b66f9cbe9aacc04f02717a4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

So far I've only liked the original name "Stealth a= ddress" and the suggestion "routing address".

Should we put this up for some kind of informal vote with co= mments allowed? Like a Google docs form?

- Sent from my phone

Den 17 jan 2014 10:18 skrev "Mike Hearn&quo= t; <mike@plan99.net>:
I must say, this shed is mighty fine looking. It'd be = a great place to store our bikes. But, what colour should we paint it?
=
How about we split the difference and go with "privacy = address"? As Peter notes, that's what people actually like and wan= t. The problem with stealth is it's got strong connotations with Americ= an military hardware and perhaps thieves sneaking around in the night:


But everyone lo= ves privacy.


On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Drak <dr= ak@zikula.org> wrote:
Peter I agree with you about =C2=A0"reusable addresse= s", but aren't we also trying to get away from the word "addr= ess" entirely? =C2=A0How about calling it a "payment key" or= "reusable payment key" instead? using "stealth" is jus= t asking for bad press imo.


On = 16 January 2014 21:28, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrot= e:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 04:05:27PM -0800, Jeremy Spilman wrote:
> Might I propose "reusable address".
>
> I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more > so encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs<= br> > 'reusable'.
>
> It definitely packs a marketing punch which could help drive
> adoption. The feature is only useful if/when broadly adopted.

I'm very against the name "reusable addresses" and stro= ngly belive we
should stick with the name stealth addresses.

You gotta look at it from the perspective of a user; lets take standard
pay-to-pubkey-hash addresses: I can tell my wallet to pay one as many
times as I want and everything works just great. I also can enter the
address on blockchain.= info's search box, and every transaction related
to the address, and the balance of it, pops up immediately.

What is that telling me? A: Addresses starting with "1" are reusa= ble. B:
Transactions associated with them appear to be public knowledge.

Now I upgrade my wallet software and it says I now have a "reusable&qu= ot;
address. My reaction is "Huh? Normal addresses are reusable, what'= s
special about this weird reusable address thing that my buddy Bob's
wallet software couldn't pay." I might even try to enter in a &quo= t;reusable"
address in blockchain.= info, which won't work, and I'll just figure
"must be some new unsupported thing" and move on with my life.
On the other hand, suppose my wallet says I now have "stealth address&= quot;
support. I'm going to think "Huh, stealth? I guess that means priv= acy
right? I like privacy." If I try searching for a stealth address on blockchain.info, w= hen it doesn't work I might think twig on "Oh right!
It said stealth addresses are private, so maybe the transactions are
hidden?" I might also think "Maybe this is like stealth/incognito= mode
in my browser? So like, there's no history being kept for others to
see?" Regardless, I'm going to be thinking "well I hear scary= stuff
about Bitcoin privacy, and this stealth thing sounds like it's gonna help, so I should learn more about that"

Finally keep in mind that stealth addresses have had a tonne of very
fast, and very wide reaching PR. The name is in the public conciousness
already, and trying to change it now just because of vague bad
associations is going to throw away the momentum of that good PR and
slow down adoption. Last night I was at the Toronto Bitcoin Meetup and I based on conversations there with people there, technical and
non-technical, almost everyone had heard about them and almost everyone
seemed to understand the basic idea of why they were a good thing. That
just wouldn't have happened with a name that tried to hide what stealth=
addresses were for, and by changing the name now we risk people not
making the connection when wallet software gets upgraded to support
them.

--
'peter'[:-1]@pet= ertodd.org
0000000000000001b0e0ae7ef97681ad77188030b6c791aef304947e6f524740

----------------------------------------= --------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam= pad/clk?id=3D119420431&iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk
__________________= _____________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment



-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam= pad/clk?id=3D119420431&iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk
__________________= _____________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment



-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam= pad/clk?id=3D119420431&iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk
__________________= _____________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment

--047d7b66f9cbe9aacc04f02717a4--