Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFBAF7AE for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:26:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 01:19:17 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from omr1.cc.vt.edu (outbound.smtp.vt.edu [198.82.183.121]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40658A9 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr6.cc.vt.edu (mr6.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2001:468:c80:2105:0:250:3bcb:5b17]) by omr1.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9QI76Vp014134 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:07:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) by mr6.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9QI71uW020977 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:07:06 -0400 Received: by padhk11 with SMTP id hk11so195203881pad.1 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:07:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vt_edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/1tV/cy7Sd7D4cGKAvNXtltyRj9s1P2xZQ747gcjAPU=; b=vWoBmS7hF0N3mDrBC7HYU1/voop9UzZfF/n2WiRLlbGgxrLIH+mRbK9fne/UfSgE9U gCQzZs1o8VleAYPxuGrkTPtRwaoLWASh4sc4E1JplSeSjp0YmNtt1eqttgWMs2m9Jw6W xvG6mTgE+OB1tAk+ulN1dfKVpqx9Evobb+za1XzSOuc5ANyIwRxssXaSM8j3qEVIAsqh 4Zz1Uoltp4vr+9Sh/PsmoXQUKG7t9z/REEwGWXbzJ9EVAgcwnWGifSAHVmmzCRqLUmRn B+7LKghM9OzvA5fJ5mQYaLb2/GcpdngWn8K+g2HlGS7s4USYK3QmkyzGgO68RKqAVHb3 OR0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/1tV/cy7Sd7D4cGKAvNXtltyRj9s1P2xZQ747gcjAPU=; b=KD2Ga07knOct+5rmmp3L4yJrCCKrcLBDdFepD7TzqP0+puer+G1Sj00vaa5581n9ym LbKadUp9Lk4aivRWHlxNRbZ5O5GB4CT6D9+tsb8PhtzWtVs824JXJWWGIygRsKyBgDTO HVlgZZBX8gu8BKUcdwyFDSPrHnW4pYRvxWF4RW7BU4PMqSEltckWpR/8ofmNjIY/lZXX zzjteWFUm2C8AA18YlHhM4/xEjERHUsc06r/D3QTVHjkB2WnBtiI2wGeLXiLDLWaxJZb 0wQ4WMUKSX+rC+nnDKQYwiwyOnvbkLNwklob+fEx6UDz1sHx6Kt9ek0NTvdJjagbsMdZ VSJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkB68DDWXomT4OeqzmYaJOSfjdVs9gZiBxOTkJfUKeP+N13+UmbaBYyqtWfYpOiDYtCQIhn0/xo3BK0IFQ31nx0SSAQ5A/M7eV6PlgXIsYSbZZ1nj224XBp39fmEkB//fcCpyoGYf7bUo7t9dg08ZBG7sB5RLVVolPJa80IzkYfoXpFNa6IPIB9RWjKcnqWLA/XYa7bW21VRGKvbcsHUuHJOpjLDg== X-Received: by 10.68.203.2 with SMTP id km2mr23056689pbc.155.1445882821121; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:07:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.203.2 with SMTP id km2mr23056680pbc.155.1445882820999; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.230] (c-24-22-36-12.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [24.22.36.12]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g12sm35308427pat.36.2015.10.26.11.07.00 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:07:00 -0700 (PDT) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <3162730.lzR74nC3xW@garp> From: Douglas Roark X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <562E6BC0.7010002@vt.edu> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:06:56 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3162730.lzR74nC3xW@garp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:10:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [patch] Switching Bitcoin Core to sqlite db X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:26:26 -0000 On 2015/10/23 03:30, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On Thursday 22 Oct 2015 17:26:42 Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote: >> It was noted that leveldb is unmaintained, and this is part of researching >> alternatives that are maintained and reliable. > > Apart from it being unmaintained, any links to what are problems with levelDB? While not exactly the most rigorous link, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LevelDB#Bugs_and_Reliability seems like an okay place to start. One thing I can attest to is that, when Armory used LevelDB (0.8 - 0.92, IIRC), quite a few users had DB corruption issues, particularly on Windows. Even when a switch to LMDB occurred for 0.93, loads of complaints would come in from users whose LevelDB-based Core DBs would fail. I know that the guy who moved Armory over to LMDB would love to have more time in the day so that he could write a Core patch that does the same. It's a very sore spot for him. (FWIW, LMDB seems to work quite nicely, at least once you patch up the source a little bit. The latest version is also compatible with Core's cross-compiling scheme. I'd love to see it added to Core one day.) Doug