Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <decker.christian@gmail.com>) id 1RLk9W-0006jW-KS
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:23:26 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=decker.christian@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ww0-f53.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1RLk9V-0002Er-G4
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:23:26 +0000
Received: by wwg7 with SMTP id 7so941017wwg.10
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.59.213 with SMTP id m21mr8245234wbh.19.1320276199150; Wed,
	02 Nov 2011 16:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.37.214 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201111021907.46512.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <1320268981.72296.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<201111021846.23887.luke@dashjr.org>
	<1320274527.19224.YahooMailNeo@web121010.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<201111021907.46512.luke@dashjr.org>
From: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 00:22:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CALxbBHV8K7CF34obMLsHnpmi65sMY3ra=JnGX00MkpYZmSo0xQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517478a02db173404b0c8c1a3
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(decker.christian[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1RLk9V-0002Er-G4
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lock protocol version numbers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:23:26 -0000

--001517478a02db173404b0c8c1a3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

The mainline client (independently from the GUI) has been referenced to as
"Satoshi" client. I personally like the name as a homage, but I guess it
all comes down to the decision of the maintainers.

Regards,
Chris

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:

> On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 6:55:27 PM Amir Taaki wrote:
> > I think calling it Satoshi is apt homage to the person who made the
> > original client reference protocol.
>
> My point is that the "Satoshi client" was the wxWidgets client, which was
> retired by 0.5.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Save $700 by Nov 18
> Register now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

--001517478a02db173404b0c8c1a3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The mainline client (independently from the GUI) has been referenced to as =
&quot;Satoshi&quot; client. I personally like the name as a homage, but I g=
uess it all comes down to the decision of the maintainers.<br><br>Regards,<=
br>

Chris<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Lu=
ke-Jr <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:luke@dashjr.org">luke@dashjr.=
org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar=
gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

<div class=3D"im">On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 6:55:27 PM Amir Taaki wro=
te:<br>
&gt; I think calling it Satoshi is apt homage to the person who made the<br=
>
&gt; original client reference protocol.<br>
<br>
</div>My point is that the &quot;Satoshi client&quot; was the wxWidgets cli=
ent, which was<br>
retired by 0.5.<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
RSA(R) Conference 2012<br>
Save $700 by Nov 18<br>
Register now<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1" target=3D"_blank">http://p.s=
f.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--001517478a02db173404b0c8c1a3--