Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <decker.christian@gmail.com>) id 1RLk9W-0006jW-KS for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:23:26 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=decker.christian@gmail.com; helo=mail-ww0-f53.google.com; Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1RLk9V-0002Er-G4 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:23:26 +0000 Received: by wwg7 with SMTP id 7so941017wwg.10 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.59.213 with SMTP id m21mr8245234wbh.19.1320276199150; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:23:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.37.214 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:22:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201111021907.46512.luke@dashjr.org> References: <1320268981.72296.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <201111021846.23887.luke@dashjr.org> <1320274527.19224.YahooMailNeo@web121010.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <201111021907.46512.luke@dashjr.org> From: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 00:22:38 +0100 Message-ID: <CALxbBHV8K7CF34obMLsHnpmi65sMY3ra=JnGX00MkpYZmSo0xQ@mail.gmail.com> To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517478a02db173404b0c8c1a3 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (decker.christian[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1RLk9V-0002Er-G4 Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lock protocol version numbers X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:23:26 -0000 --001517478a02db173404b0c8c1a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The mainline client (independently from the GUI) has been referenced to as "Satoshi" client. I personally like the name as a homage, but I guess it all comes down to the decision of the maintainers. Regards, Chris On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote: > On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 6:55:27 PM Amir Taaki wrote: > > I think calling it Satoshi is apt homage to the person who made the > > original client reference protocol. > > My point is that the "Satoshi client" was the wxWidgets client, which was > retired by 0.5. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > --001517478a02db173404b0c8c1a3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The mainline client (independently from the GUI) has been referenced to as = "Satoshi" client. I personally like the name as a homage, but I g= uess it all comes down to the decision of the maintainers.<br><br>Regards,<= br> Chris<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Lu= ke-Jr <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:luke@dashjr.org">luke@dashjr.= org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar= gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> <div class=3D"im">On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 6:55:27 PM Amir Taaki wro= te:<br> > I think calling it Satoshi is apt homage to the person who made the<br= > > original client reference protocol.<br> <br> </div>My point is that the "Satoshi client" was the wxWidgets cli= ent, which was<br> retired by 0.5.<br> <div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---<br> RSA(R) Conference 2012<br> Save $700 by Nov 18<br> Register now<br> <a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1" target=3D"_blank">http://p.s= f.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1</a><br> _______________________________________________<br> Bitcoin-development mailing list<br> <a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br> <a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development= " target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br> --001517478a02db173404b0c8c1a3--