Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YqP8r-0006oF-Fu for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 07 May 2015 16:59:21 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.49; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f49.google.com; Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YqP8q-0008LE-4Z for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 07 May 2015 16:59:21 +0000 Received: by labbd9 with SMTP id bd9so35278392lab.2 for ; Thu, 07 May 2015 09:59:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.4.72 with SMTP id i8mr3967262lai.32.1431017953760; Thu, 07 May 2015 09:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.90.75 with HTTP; Thu, 7 May 2015 09:59:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <554A91BE.6060105@bluematt.me> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 12:59:13 -0400 Message-ID: From: Gavin Andresen To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01494248cd1e48051580d4d5 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YqP8q-0008LE-4Z Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 16:59:21 -0000 --089e01494248cd1e48051580d4d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fee dynamics seems to come up over and over again in these discussions, with lots of talk and theorizing. I hope some data on what is happening with fees right now might help, so I wrote another blog post (with graphs, which can't be done in a mailing list post): http://gavinandresen.ninja/the-myth-of-not-full-blocks We don=E2=80=99t need 100% full one megabyte blocks to start to learn about= what is likely to happen as transaction volume rises and/or the one megabyte block size limit is raised. --=20 -- Gavin Andresen --089e01494248cd1e48051580d4d5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Fee dynamics seems to come= up over and over again in these discussions, with lots of talk and theoriz= ing.

I hope some data on what is happening with fe= es right now might help, so I wrote another blog post (with graphs, which c= an't be done in a mailing list post):

We don=E2=80= =99t need 100% full one megabyte blocks to start to learn about what is lik= ely to happen as transaction volume rises and/or the one megabyte block siz= e limit is raised.

--
--
Gavin Andresen=
--089e01494248cd1e48051580d4d5--