Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1W3jyT-0007Vl-KE for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:14:57 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of zikula.org designates 209.85.212.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.174; envelope-from=drak@zikula.org; helo=mail-wi0-f174.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1W3jyR-0000E8-Pc for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:14:57 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id g10so5358301wiw.7 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 02:14:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=CX924s2p9b/M3yS2GOYlBLdfLoBlqw0unlJPrukaqc8=; b=VWK0GZkyESbDOPNVTjr8KA4c2vQyhtS4B/swoEtJOABTNQJM4UrCdgNqJv7kPD1zcf hC0EFl11K7u6FE1RKwCuzW1TtC2vfEbgRJw+w+ID4KwIpiV5FpwTLLbYFM/KIQNImi0p WB/17uP3/tUscC82iDLm/qwBF1Iqw0wrUxqr3S+rFrfRAsbKVAfjVbjfQCWW2dP6ocXy gNnlmLhB8JgkiIeA+lNp4NHdHo2X6VNHPeV88G142W1z1rwGKZ6RZj/CdtKouFzQSc1k r00/HwuXmAnay3BSMImE9OrXSyDx2l1mPoPm/0QuQ3VXwyY4QhLsyg/Ovw7kS9cWJT/m hYUA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmtcHUsPoX2YxTWZ0T0h403JQev5wb93HfCuVQHflIDu++m59svOZLLaqHsskQLz9WfdwrD X-Received: by 10.180.211.101 with SMTP id nb5mr9490225wic.0.1389867284156; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 02:14:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.30.8 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 02:14:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20140106120338.GA14918@savin> <20140110102037.GB25749@savin> <20140113133746.GI38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> <20140114225321.GT38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> From: Drak Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:14:24 +0000 Message-ID: To: Jeremy Spilman Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c37cc6c1e69a04f013b18d X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1W3jyR-0000E8-Pc Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:14:57 -0000 --001a11c37cc6c1e69a04f013b18d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 16 January 2014 00:05, Jeremy Spilman wrote: > Might I propose "reusable address". > > I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so > encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'. > The problem is all addresses are reusable and to an average user, addresses are already reusable so there is little to distinguish the address format. It might be better to call it a "public address" in common terminology. Drak --001a11c37cc6c1e69a04f013b18d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 1= 6 January 2014 00:05, Jeremy Spilman <jeremy@taplink.co> wro= te:
Might I propose "reusable address".

I think that= describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so encourages walle= ts to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'.

The problem is all addresses are reu= sable and to an average user, addresses are already reusable so there is li= ttle to distinguish the address format.
It might be better to cal= l it a "public address" in common terminology.

Drak
=C2=A0
--001a11c37cc6c1e69a04f013b18d--