Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Td9qt-0006Pp-73 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 01:20:43 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.175; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; helo=mail-vc0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Td9qs-0006rp-Gg for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 01:20:43 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m8so8530284vcd.34 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:20:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.100.65 with SMTP id ew1mr19024780vdb.125.1353979237017; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:20:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.224.16.57] (75.sub-174-252-56.myvzw.com. [174.252.56.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ey7sm8425355ved.0.2012.11.26.17.20.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:20:36 -0800 (PST) References: <201211262319.37533.luke@dashjr.org> <201211262344.03385.luke@dashjr.org> From: Gavin Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:09:25 -0500 To: Rick Wesson Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Td9qs-0006rp-Gg Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol Proposal: Invoices/Payments/Receipts X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 01:20:43 -0000 Supporting DNSSEC/DANE in the future when they are widely deployed is a grea= t idea. Note that the x509chain field is 'repeated', and any repeated field may have= zero entries. So I would suggest supporting other PKI systems in the future= by adding optional new fields (for maximum compatibility or security mercha= nts might want to include both a x509chain AND=20 -- Gavin Andresen