Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15636117F for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:18:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78EA8EE for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.10.25] (B [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:18:06 -0400 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org> From: Milly Bitcoin Message-ID: <560D94F3.1080201@bitcoins.info> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:17:55 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_QUERY autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Crossing the line? [Was: Re: Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!] X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:18:10 -0000 > Given the current reddit hubbub, a bit of a cooling off period is IMO > advisable before taking any further action. > > 2. If so, does the community feel that Mike Hearn has crossed it? (I > personally feel he has. Multiple times.) > I don't believe any posting by Mr. Hearn warrants any actions by some undefined community. Since I disagree with TaoEffect.com (aka "PRIVATE REGISTRANT") he has no consensus. lol Russ