Return-Path: <bitcoin-dev@wuille.net>
Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC40EC0051
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844AA22713
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id RYgRvaVrY25Z
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-40136.protonmail.ch (mail-40136.protonmail.ch
 [185.70.40.136])
 by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28E5226A2
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:24 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:17 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wuille.net;
 s=protonmail; t=1597878982;
 bh=MCsiL98oNjvB5LKp2E6U10lGDHft77ahLOzQ5gpqceY=;
 h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=GzNOEz/3dLc/dPXTovbS1k3OipwdXTxSSvIsFfGvXPhm6kt8osEc2sRaKsKjisBUs
 1Gcb7h6JZ00JsP5MFSDPDryvd+obyCW78wf+NOlm1yACUIei6H3df2If3ea01gsnNS
 PwSo4ZNe9v8YthJkKXiIKk2bVg/gFPoJBUWvoKeg=
To: Bitcoin dev list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: Pieter Wuille <bitcoin-dev@wuille.net>
Reply-To: Pieter Wuille <bitcoin-dev@wuille.net>
Message-ID: <ELtsqlQfq8t4RW8xGmoSgVO0NMYPUQx92wE308PGeIAo7t3Tu0CLpzwigPLi0Hh5IOC-iRtW965d3l8Ahgl0e4LpCuUymsS6RdBCXNCibs8=@wuille.net>
In-Reply-To: <g7VgKBKlUmgMkNo6Nq1OkyilwW6Z4WbqeSZHXfvh_LDYmry5R7uGbavyEHtv2xr_0KBevL057TxSdlo_tS0_ucBXYNm8MuTu_jgyrGO9jpo=@wuille.net>
References: <g7VgKBKlUmgMkNo6Nq1OkyilwW6Z4WbqeSZHXfvh_LDYmry5R7uGbavyEHtv2xr_0KBevL057TxSdlo_tS0_ucBXYNm8MuTu_jgyrGO9jpo=@wuille.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:03:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting squaredness tiebreaker for R point in
	BIP340
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:26 -0000

On Wednesday, August 12, 2020 11:49 AM, Pieter Wuille <bitcoin-dev@wuille.n=
et> wrote:

> It is late in the process, but I feel I owe this explanation so that at l=
east the possibility of changing can be discussed with all information.

As the responses have been pretty positive so far, we've gone ahead and mad=
e a patch to implement the change to the even tiebreaker: https://github.co=
m/sipa/bips/pull/210

If there are no other arguments (against), I'll PR it to the BIPs repo in a=
 week or so.

All comments/questions/... still welcome.

Cheers,

--
Pieter