Return-Path: <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A674892
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:47:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com (mail-la0-f46.google.com
	[209.85.215.46])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3FA163
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:47:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lalv9 with SMTP id v9so93411304lal.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 01:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=U7C087jlcgQ7jnt9z1xkhqkUgZ8CmxoGxowGN+4Fcw0=;
	b=vPuA1Ed2EuQiBL1w33mrctgZXr3INRqzc+Oq0W777BXic66nsxfGQkkG0ZamlXxNx1
	3gA07TXwhPrfE4SNWqy8/WQw+ncwIyytbj97dQBF4TiLvuu3eDGaGh3rqwErkLPHd40B
	Q9u9+DSF0ayWzpAphGWWV3KzsAVxGuUJtjCB8NrVgWeHh1NETv7v4bBw+nwiuokTYEmD
	2lhPiAtXtsaAbM6lBLrOIVsbTyKZq7sG56cAghX2unV6hocsVdBjVAKzXJy4QITkFYXi
	NOfR5NXEQZcfKLl6la/RzLmhefOVWs0XXNnJ00Zs7EJR9dHPtxUnfQlC+0E9MNfYW43D
	qLPA==
X-Received: by 10.112.14.8 with SMTP id l8mr22533711lbc.68.1440492427556; Tue,
	25 Aug 2015 01:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+1nnrnybS7u_9F46rEbnsPa1UDCMTau3X6SDahstawPzmXEjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D6B653.6050108@riseup.net>
	<CALxbBHWvXjrUeeryArYQkgGT6kY-XpOzm4yUY5TUjC4jz+F0xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADm_Wcb-M=hxcAvb4JS_AeuGYgjs=Xdyc0o0SR3o9R1xheHv1A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADm_Wcb-M=hxcAvb4JS_AeuGYgjs=Xdyc0o0SR3o9R1xheHv1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:46:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CALxbBHWqoK38tn_F3LTKi=6i55rhuZKOy=UDgy3SQr39hm+EGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c36b7472b9a7051e1ec71e
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>,
	Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RE : Visualizations of Votes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:47:11 -0000

--001a11c36b7472b9a7051e1ec71e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Yes, the two dimensions are orthogonal: BIP 100 support and actual size
voting. However there seem to be a few pools which simply vote to support
BIP100, without specifying a desired block size [1], hence I started
tracking both on the same chart, maybe I'll split them into different
charts to clarify.

Regards,
Chris

[1]
https://blockchain.info/tx/ba1e5d21a340772d637ee5dc0bde8072ad1a7b499ba241d5bfaae9618749531e

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:46 PM Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is a duplicated column.
>
> BIP 100 voting is /BV\d+/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> I hacked together a simple tracking page for the 'block votes', it
>> currently includes the 8MB vote and XT, as well as the /BV\d+/ vote for
>> generic size:
>> http://bitcoinstats.com/network/votes/
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:25 AM odinn via bitcoin-dev <
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Hello Nicolas,
>>>
>>> On 08/20/2015 08:49 PM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>> >> A visualization I would like to see would include:
>>> >
>>> >> pie graph(s) of what % are voting for (BIP 100, BIP 101, 8MB, BIP
>>> >> sipa
>>> > etc) based on what's published in blocks.
>>> >
>>> > If such a vote existed, I would gladly show the pie on BIPxDevs.
>>> > However there is no standard way for miners to vote informally BIP
>>> > they support.
>>>
>>> What about formal votes? Is there a way to visually have them appear
>>> in a pie chart as the votes become apparent in blocks?
>>>
>>> I appreciate good visualizations and am trying to get a (visual)
>>> comparison of the votes on these competing proposals.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing
>>> > list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>> - --
>>> http://abis.io ~
>>> "a protocol concept to enable decentralization
>>> and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
>>> https://keybase.io/odinn
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>
>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV1rZSAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CuNgIAIOIpHavzz6EJ5AOGBg2T859
>>> MV7rsPfk1HBV4K1Yf4HfrlD/1SY0L57SANpRodi1NME3pl27QQCDnuwNLAqOLKtA
>>> P/sHXnk9LuSG8Czk0PHOslZ+f1fDbmNm9gtR3QWXGOx0jP2b+WQ8RhkPhqQ++S/i
>>> oXmjyrk+8TTu1hxMbuCcG5bqeS0lBm0SyrSbRTPWH+4U1jGYbxQNKkHnuZGByX4B
>>> HBWuKvIylQzHCfy0ToUW+Z29Y+78wQNQUOA10eq7qpZCZvfRZUov1KBVXLx8GAKy
>>> Y5WGSJYIAt+Rwn9eMxhpD91ZR1vwtqtRZn7M+NtrStPBJt+n4ET9VmPpsMAc/Zc=
>>> =AHv3
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>>
>

--001a11c36b7472b9a7051e1ec71e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Yes, the two dimensions are orthogonal: BIP 100 support an=
d actual size voting. However there seem to be a few pools which simply vot=
e to support BIP100, without specifying a desired block size [1], hence I s=
tarted tracking both on the same chart, maybe I&#39;ll split them into diff=
erent charts to clarify.<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Chris</div><=
div><div><br></div><div>[1]=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://blockchain.info/tx/ba1e=
5d21a340772d637ee5dc0bde8072ad1a7b499ba241d5bfaae9618749531e">https://block=
chain.info/tx/ba1e5d21a340772d637ee5dc0bde8072ad1a7b499ba241d5bfaae96187495=
31e</a><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Mon, Aug 24, =
2015 at 4:46 PM Jeff Garzik &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jgarzik@gmail.com">jgarzi=
k@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=
=3D"ltr">There is a duplicated column.<div><br></div><div>BIP 100 voting is=
 /BV\d+/</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra=
"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Christian=
 Decker via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev=
@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfounda=
tion.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=
=3D"ltr">I hacked together a simple tracking page for the &#39;block votes&=
#39;, it currently includes the 8MB vote and XT, as well as the /BV\d+/ vot=
e for generic size:<div><a href=3D"http://bitcoinstats.com/network/votes/" =
target=3D"_blank">http://bitcoinstats.com/network/votes/</a><br></div></div=
><div><div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Fri, Aug 21, =
2015 at 7:25 AM odinn via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lis=
ts.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation=
.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar=
gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">-----BEGIN PGP =
SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
Hello Nicolas,<br>
<br>
On 08/20/2015 08:49 PM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; A visualization I would like to see would include:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; pie graph(s) of what % are voting for (BIP 100, BIP 101, 8MB, BIP<=
br>
&gt;&gt; sipa<br>
&gt; etc) based on what&#39;s published in blocks.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; If such a vote existed, I would gladly show the pie on BIPxDevs.<br>
&gt; However there is no standard way for miners to vote informally BIP<br>
&gt; they support.<br>
<br>
What about formal votes? Is there a way to visually have them appear<br>
in a pie chart as the votes become apparent in blocks?<br>
<br>
I appreciate good visualizations and am trying to get a (visual)<br>
comparison of the votes on these competing proposals.<br>
<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing<br=
>
&gt; list <a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=
=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
&gt; <a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-=
dev" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
- --<br>
<a href=3D"http://abis.io" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://abis=
.io</a> ~<br>
&quot;a protocol concept to enable decentralization<br>
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good&quot;<br>
<a href=3D"https://keybase.io/odinn" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">h=
ttps://keybase.io/odinn</a><br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1<br>
<br>
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV1rZSAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CuNgIAIOIpHavzz6EJ5AOGBg2T859<br>
MV7rsPfk1HBV4K1Yf4HfrlD/1SY0L57SANpRodi1NME3pl27QQCDnuwNLAqOLKtA<br>
P/sHXnk9LuSG8Czk0PHOslZ+f1fDbmNm9gtR3QWXGOx0jP2b+WQ8RhkPhqQ++S/i<br>
oXmjyrk+8TTu1hxMbuCcG5bqeS0lBm0SyrSbRTPWH+4U1jGYbxQNKkHnuZGByX4B<br>
HBWuKvIylQzHCfy0ToUW+Z29Y+78wQNQUOA10eq7qpZCZvfRZUov1KBVXLx8GAKy<br>
Y5WGSJYIAt+Rwn9eMxhpD91ZR1vwtqtRZn7M+NtrStPBJt+n4ET9VmPpsMAc/Zc=3D<br>
=3DAHv3<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div></div></div></div>

--001a11c36b7472b9a7051e1ec71e--