Return-Path: <jgarzik@gmail.com> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B558BC4 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 23:54:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F21A7 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 23:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicnd19 with SMTP id nd19so43779155wic.1 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:54:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mTYJZS3AAD5R8nBj0TdWR4eOrS1PWfXm3kbv7lve6bU=; b=yzG7Q7J4zXn7ZmNcWHBMisyZrGm79wBBO7yCE37DH6CkDvju3gqH++Kvkr7m1q/hZm dPWBZG8LUbaN5I7KCNZeNxm9/T9urjAA1IzXvRY0YviHf/rTjHaV+Yfb1rjm0mGWyl7h wkRuoLO8PmGLzSPa+dyC1itLIILYBEm1G0N2lqCGeqM/7HL5ANkwV2YsrOxlqlh9iIoz Rd6P5QycoRzcTujeAki6nbOlnkOfvujIom1d+3mFb+fSIp40USlOu8b2gcPnDlKZDzEM 9DYmcJS2D5COmtBvnMV4PLcJjIu+9k5xXQnBq50ZvgW8H1CSZLdXFp8kqnDcUAdNFzo8 AghQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.75.78 with SMTP id a14mr9862463wiw.68.1435449240289; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.140.196 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:54:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti2-QChRZYZDSH1avit3snCLMws2UNmHQ_aY5O4txCS3AGg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD2Ti2-QChRZYZDSH1avit3snCLMws2UNmHQ_aY5O4txCS3AGg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:54:00 -0700 Message-ID: <CADm_WcbjAmrBXJs6s9rvVKccgOA3sDut0o2ALTKqWQrjT=MyxQ@mail.gmail.com> From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com> To: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0438eb9d0f8539051988920f X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Mailing List Administrivia - GPG, Archives, Breakage, TODO, mirrors, etc X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 23:54:06 -0000 --f46d0438eb9d0f8539051988920f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Generally agreed w/ all this. To preserve digital signatures now and in the future, and make mbox archives actually useful, a minimum modification policy is needed. On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:21 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Frank Flores <frankf44@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you're going to go through the trouble of signing your public emails > ... > > ... then you should also demand that the official archives of your > favorite lists preserve them and their verifiability in the supposedly > canonical reference "mbox" format that they distribute. > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan > <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote: > > Subject: [bitcoin-dev] New GPG signing key for Bitcoin Core binary > releases > > > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/009045.html > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June.txt.gz > > As you can clearly see, both the HTML archives and the "mbox" > archives have corrupted this message, it will not verify. Do not > try to say this case is trivial, the problem itself is not trivial, > it's gratuitous, and it applies to all matching messages... text, > code, binary inline... that's dangerous. > > Do not try to say this corruption prevents spam, it does not. > Spammers simply subscribe to the list and harvest everything > efficiently in realtime... no webcrawling overhead, no stale > addresses. Obfuscation is futile. > > This misfeature needs to be disabled. > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com> > wrote: > > archives will be exported > > and imported into the new list server > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Andy Schroder <info@andyschroder.com> > wrote: > > I'm not sure if anyone has submitted a request for gmane > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:35 PM, s7r <s7r@sky-ip.org> wrote: > > Do we have all the archives imported? I run several full nodes and > > mirrors for open source projects, if you think it's useful, I can > > provide a mirror for the mail list archives. > > Yes... these other mirrors, archives, analysis, journalism, and > interfaces are useful. However, as it is now, there are no useful > authoritative sources for them to seed from... they're all corrupt. > And any subscribed realtime sources, though nice, are subject to > downtime, administrative and other unrecoverable gaps. Your mirror > project is a fine idea, you should demand that the pristine historical > sources be made publicly available. Not just for you, but for everyone. > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015, grarpamp wrote: > > ... > > As before, the current "mbox" archives are broken and not useful... > > a) They corrupt message data, messages are unverifiable, another example... > > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/009132.html > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June.txt.gz > b) They are missing the minimum set of original headers necessary > for fully replyable, threadable, sortable, searchable, context > preserving and direct use by users MUA's in their local environment: > (Date, From, To, Cc, Subject, Message-ID, In-Reply-To, References) > c) They do not include attachments (patches, signatures, images, crypto, > data) that are absolutely necessary to the context and archives > of all lists. Instead they stupidly throw them away to "web links" > which results not only in uselessness of the so called "mbox" > version, but in many thousands of needless fetches by archive > users and indexers. And hours of wasted work attempting to > postprocess them into usable form. > Valuable content lost from the "mbox" files this June alone: > 418 attachment.html > 106 attachment.sig > 6 attachment.jpe > 4 attachment.png > 2 attachment.bin > d) There appear to be at least 15 instances of unescaped '^From ' > in the "mbox". Regeneration with current mailman may fix. One such > case is here: > > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-January/004245.html > > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-January.txt.gz > > > > Please fix all the above mentioned issues by providing the full raw > archives in regularly updated [gzip/7z] mbox format. The internet > thanks you :) > > Example, compare the "Downloadable version"s here: > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/ > https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/ > https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2015-February/006820.html > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Andy Schroder <info@andyschroder.com> > wrote: > > Regarding message footers and the subject prefix > > Yes, they're also corruptive and space wasting clutter, for and by > the clueless :( Both of them should be turned off. > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --f46d0438eb9d0f8539051988920f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Generally agreed w/ all this.<div><br></div><div>To preser= ve digital signatures now and in the future, and make mbox archives actuall= y useful, a minimum modification policy is needed.</div><div><br></div><div= ><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">= On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:21 PM, grarpamp <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"= mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">grarpamp@gmail.com</a>></sp= an> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;= border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:14 P= M, Frank Flores <<a href=3D"mailto:frankf44@gmail.com">frankf44@gmail.co= m</a>> wrote:<br> > If you're going to go through the trouble of signing your public e= mails ...<br> <br> ... then you should also demand that the official archives of your<br> favorite lists preserve them and their verifiability in the supposedly<br> canonical reference "mbox" format that they distribute.<br> <br> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan<br> <<a href=3D"mailto:laanwj@gmail.com">laanwj@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> > Subject: [bitcoin-dev] New GPG signing key for Bitcoin Core binary rel= eases<br> <br> <a href=3D"http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June= /009045.html" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.linuxfounda= tion.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/009045.html</a><br> <a href=3D"http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June= .txt.gz" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.linuxfoundation.= org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June.txt.gz</a><br> <br> As you can clearly see, both the HTML archives and the "mbox"<br> archives have corrupted this message, it will not verify. Do not<br> try to say this case is trivial, the problem itself is not trivial,<br> it's gratuitous, and it applies to all matching messages... text,<br> code, binary inline... that's dangerous.<br> <br> Do not try to say this corruption prevents spam, it does not.<br> Spammers simply subscribe to the list and harvest everything<br> efficiently in realtime... no webcrawling overhead, no stale<br> addresses. Obfuscation is futile.<br> <br> This misfeature needs to be disabled.<br> <br> <br> <br> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Warren Togami Jr. <<a href=3D"mailto:w= togami@gmail.com">wtogami@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> > archives will be exported<br> > and imported into the new list server<br> <br> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Andy Schroder <<a href=3D"mailto:info@a= ndyschroder.com">info@andyschroder.com</a>> wrote:<br> > I'm not sure if anyone has submitted a request for gmane<br> <br> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:35 PM, s7r <<a href=3D"mailto:s7r@sky-ip.org">= s7r@sky-ip.org</a>> wrote:<br> > Do we have all the archives imported? I run several full nodes and<br> > mirrors for open source projects, if you think it's useful, I can<= br> > provide a mirror for the mail list archives.<br> <br> Yes... these other mirrors, archives, analysis, journalism, and<br> interfaces are useful. However, as it is now, there are no useful<br> authoritative sources for them to seed from... they're all corrupt.<br> And any subscribed realtime sources, though nice, are subject to<br> downtime, administrative and other unrecoverable gaps. Your mirror<br> project is a fine idea, you should demand that the pristine historical<br> sources be made publicly available. Not just for you, but for everyone.<br> <br> <br> <br> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015, grarpamp wrote:<br> > ...<br> <br> As before, the current "mbox" archives are broken and not useful.= ..<br> <br> a) They corrupt message data, messages are unverifiable, another example...= <br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-= dev/2015-June/009132.html" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://list= s.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/009132.html</a><br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-= dev/2015-June.txt.gz" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.lin= uxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June.txt.gz</a><br> b) They are missing the minimum set of original headers necessary<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0for fully replyable, threadable, sortable, searchable, context= <br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0preserving and direct use by users MUA's in their local en= vironment:<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0(Date, From, To, Cc, Subject, Message-ID, In-Reply-To, Referen= ces)<br> c) They do not include attachments (patches, signatures, images, crypto,<br= > =C2=A0 =C2=A0data) that are absolutely necessary to the context and archive= s<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0of all lists. Instead they stupidly throw them away to "w= eb links"<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0which results not only in uselessness of the so called "m= box"<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0version, but in many thousands of needless fetches by archive<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0users and indexers. And hours of wasted work attempting to<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0postprocess them into usable form.<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Valuable content lost from the "mbox" files this Jun= e alone:<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 418 attachment.html<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 106 attachment.sig<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 6 attachment.jpe<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 4 attachment.png<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 2 attachment.bin<br> d) There appear to be at least 15 instances of unescaped '^From '<b= r> =C2=A0 =C2=A0in the "mbox". Regeneration with current mailman may= fix. One such<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0case is here:<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-= dev/2014-January/004245.html" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://l= ists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-January/004245.html</a>= <br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-= dev/2014-January.txt.gz" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.= linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-January.txt.gz</a><br> <br> <br> <br> Please fix all the above mentioned issues by providing the full raw<br> archives in regularly updated [gzip/7z] mbox format. The internet<br> thanks you :)<br> <br> Example, compare the "Downloadable version"s here:<br> <a href=3D"http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/" rel=3D"= noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bi= tcoin-dev/</a><br> <a href=3D"https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/" rel=3D"noreferrer" ta= rget=3D"_blank">https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/</a><br> <a href=3D"https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2015-February/006820.ht= ml" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cyphe= rpunks/2015-February/006820.html</a><br> <br> <br> <br> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Andy Schroder <<a href=3D"mailto:info@a= ndyschroder.com">info@andyschroder.com</a>> wrote:<br> > Regarding message footers and the subject prefix<br> <br> Yes, they're also corruptive and space wasting clutter, for and by<br> the clueless :( Both of them should be turned off.<br> _______________________________________________<br> bitcoin-dev mailing list<br> <a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org</a><br> <a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" = rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br> </blockquote></div><br></div> --f46d0438eb9d0f8539051988920f--