Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Yy2as-0006r3-Ti for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 28 May 2015 18:31:50 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.42; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f42.google.com; Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Yy2as-0004IS-41 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 28 May 2015 18:31:50 +0000 Received: by labpy14 with SMTP id py14so26950330lab.0 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 11:31:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.204.40 with SMTP id kv8mr4078128lac.113.1432837903754; Thu, 28 May 2015 11:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.90.75 with HTTP; Thu, 28 May 2015 11:31:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:31:43 -0400 Message-ID: From: Gavin Andresen To: Steven Pine Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11347da6462d5d051728925e X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Yy2as-0004IS-41 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:31:50 -0000 --001a11347da6462d5d051728925e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Can we hold off on bike-shedding the particular choice of parameters until people have a chance to weigh in on whether or not there is SOME set of dynamic parameters they would support right now? -- -- Gavin Andresen --001a11347da6462d5d051728925e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Can we hold off on bike-shedding the particular choice of = parameters until people have a chance to weigh in on whether or not there i= s SOME set of dynamic parameters they would support right now?


--
--
Gavin Andresen
--001a11347da6462d5d051728925e--