Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <saivann@gmail.com>) id 1VpTTc-0005dN-45
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 08 Dec 2013 01:48:08 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.223.176 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.223.176; envelope-from=saivann@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ie0-f176.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1VpTTb-0004f8-G5
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 08 Dec 2013 01:48:08 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id at1so3936125iec.21
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:48:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.50.154.102 with SMTP id vn6mr6429337igb.1.1386467282139;
	Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([199.192.237.161])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x6sm6382181igb.3.2013.12.07.17.48.00
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52A3C8A5.7010606@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 20:17:25 -0500
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sa=EFvann_Carignan?= <saivann@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(saivann[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
	See
	http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
	for more information. [URIs: bitcoin.org]
X-Headers-End: 1VpTTb-0004f8-G5
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org,
	your thoughts?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 01:48:08 -0000

I would like to know what are your thoughts on moving bitcoin.org on a
dedicated server with a SSL certificate?

I am considering the idea more seriously, but I'd like some feedback
before taking steps.

Saïvann