Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Vad3X-00058y-IV for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:59:51 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([192.3.11.21]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Vad3W-0000Gy-CI for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:59:51 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:222:4dff:fe50:4c49]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DB891080834 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:59:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:59:38 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.15-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <274a1888-276c-4aa6-a818-68f548fbe0fa@me.com> <526B45DB.2030200@jerviss.org> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201310280259.40063.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: bitcoin.it] X-Headers-End: 1Vad3W-0000Gy-CI Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Feedback requested: "reject" p2p message X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:59:51 -0000 On Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:52:25 PM Gavin Andresen wrote: > If anybody has strong feelings about what the reject categories should be, > then please take the time to write a specific list, I can't read your > mind.... It might make sense to use the rejection reasons from BIP 22 where applicable. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0022#Appendix:_Example_Rejection_Reasons Luke