Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <stick@gk2.sk>) id 1YBUYv-00085F-Ph
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:29:09 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YBUYs-0005mp-2W
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:29:09 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k11so10946215wes.6
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:28:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=5hG6v+ZACnB9plq5+04nnED0VpPxReqCJh+oRozkcPE=;
	b=RVo8GKznlzmGjAGKeTrYOstGowAmGE/SFfLBENCfbkoRXv90eEvpvRFf+1FvfBf9A0
	vxVNXlZ8fdHG588WTfmJajv6MIhtLIS/cCV2Oxc4h5pdKtR/1TJYcOyrt1WU2Ngri3xr
	3ACJFnVNrISIVbpxMUO3/xGlOi74N1E/WKgk3EQLWSD5XOTTjbxSoVLlPC7iZWxPHFrQ
	PBRAEoCWgzcIpNIEztm4hiy40g7CuS/G0uaYBe1OT53/bQgVxAdkYsrE13NpUJe5CRa6
	mCPEnwQK7X7peiETS4YW/66fuA2wdIx+3yvrP4LIZoVDdZApj7nAOiZ8lActDgKq9lJY
	pDNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqZlcFZn+bMuv6GEJqb14VnclMK7jMIZRKwWc0gXEsuEu5a4MHJn0uktSijAT0YbTOGRz0
X-Received: by 10.180.205.163 with SMTP id lh3mr54177962wic.63.1421265538321; 
	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tetra.site ([185.68.216.100])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g2sm23347015wjn.11.2015.01.14.11.58.56
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:58:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54B6CA7E.3070600@gk2.sk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:58:54 +0100
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeffrey Paul <jp@eeqj.com>, devrandom <c1.sf-bitcoin@niftybox.net>
References: <CABETNRtquBWEZZ=jOcWojcgMTpjU5nWP9p74DArLxOXqqQT7og@mail.gmail.com>	<1421257150.8969.4.camel@niftybox.net>
	<6E575287-887C-4628-834C-282B67AFAA94@eeqj.com>
In-Reply-To: <6E575287-887C-4628-834C-282B67AFAA94@eeqj.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1YBUYs-0005mp-2W
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Ruben de Vries <ruben@blocktrail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] convention/standard for sorting public
 keys for p2sh multisig transactions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:29:09 -0000

On 14/01/15 20:27, Jeffrey Paul wrote:
> To clarify: the raw bytes of the public key itself, not the ascii base58 representation of the pubkey hash - right?

Could you give an example of two pubkeys where the following condition
is met?

raw(pubkey1) > raw(pubkey2) and base58(pubkey1) < base58(pubkey2)

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>