Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 373BC8F5 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 14:44:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C34D14C for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 14:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id v186so24345231wmd.0 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 07:44:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Am66n08uhel9ye53eBOMPlBs888lpWdbfF5sIUk+NEo=; b=bka7afC+xFGd+kJ1+YPtypBcDbZFnXKgG7dYBuFviL2wbBGx+nUtdYLOKOQyGVGk0Q 1Dq0s/+XaDQ7iHHogqXpAaXmsDB/JcKqwsVY/awwblkWUzdJ9zEy90EWNdnlMwsz6zEY oZjSKOxiL93omUYBCORyxcAKBcnS2zRXluz2Lq8/NAoyTfezOyoLmJTBnPq1mwP267u4 Bo7YJCeVdAWNrFTfy6uFjCdw3kzGOLTkwwyCCAjU53BHPH0WFyiVmkA1mPD2KoziWm/e mYD+5EpJ+YIsPXUuH+89Mcnlv8JzLZ14VbpUHkGumRccjtvq1s/cOXPzveE6rXx7zwtb n4Eg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Am66n08uhel9ye53eBOMPlBs888lpWdbfF5sIUk+NEo=; b=hNgvbH/QF6lf9iQYpkzlvEG4wmGc1MYIDd/ohjdzbCxKsDdUbnMGirlexEqBsMcdd3 Q+ETy0S3BBNB944Hl2Qu8IGcSjZfd6KqIz+uKyY0/RVGdOhW1csDrbEs0yN84lCcnHuZ YHJea/svlqaKNvBT8U8Id43L0psw9E7RJKoBSeL7wJ1Dpunx9w9k7egNRZj9p9hLILxs hEvW1sEg/60cEgP0UUCKbte0KxfKEtpoC4AJLaso9dlhrS2Q+lPJxHcBz4QCxJYRVADZ UVZ//xtuA5X/BlRsbK7/PXn2jyk7/IIpcndbKe0aNzlWyx/+lC1JBCr67cxZ9C7Y/3c7 hLAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3MS0xL/FTA8adO9vR5ZAHwhNIUAiUjnc/SEWB/mzEN8j8KhRDNKcPM1Ln97wZPCiYot5wFwtoUctEg/A== X-Received: by 10.28.132.2 with SMTP id g2mr6530739wmd.103.1489329861135; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 07:44:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.92.193 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 07:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.92.193 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 07:44:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: David Vorick Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 10:44:20 -0400 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Dev , ashish khandekar Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114423c6539232054a89a129 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Solution for blockchain congestion and determination of block size by bitcoin network/protocol itself. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 14:44:23 -0000 --001a114423c6539232054a89a129 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 What, in your appraisal, is the purpose of the block size limit? I think we will be more able to have a productive discussion around this proposal if we clear that up first. --001a114423c6539232054a89a129 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
What, in your appraisal, is the purpose of the block size limit? I think we will be more able to have a productive discussion around this proposal if we clear that up first.
--001a114423c6539232054a89a129--