Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:47:51 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Jameson Lopp <jameson.lopp@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150627184751.GA16460@muck>
References: <CALgxB7udA85BWetBGc-RN=72ZtVPK9Q5HW8YRDKA08M38XqJqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALqxMTHjszPcf=S20kquF=5y3zfYb+foP6tL1okOT2jhdrW08A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALgxB7tdFsQXzGRje=suC7Yaym_Whhtn2qrb3ykx2ZOBwwbE7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150627163731.GA12820@muck>
	<CALgxB7tsmHGiGuCmcdNuwjKxNfBpdq6U+x8eK=7sL6NekAfXow@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150627173451.GA28181@muck>
	<CADL_X_ekJ_agt+94z-9_cQGdTOQym5t+6X+G4+AxvNBRpYBnTg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADL_X_ekJ_agt+94z-9_cQGdTOQym5t+6X+G4+AxvNBRpYBnTg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Proposed Compromise to the Block Size Limit
Precedence: list


--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 02:02:05PM -0400, Jameson Lopp wrote:
> > For Bitcoin to have O(n) scaling you have to assume that the number of
> > validation nodes doesn't scale with the number of users, thus resulting
> > in a system where users trust others to do validation for them. That is
> > not a global consensus system; that's a trust-based system.
> >
> >
> Why does it matter what the "total work" of the network is? Anyone who is
> participating as a node on the network only cares about the resources
> required to run their own node, not the resources everyone else needs to
> run their nodes.
>=20
> Also, no assumption needed, it is quite clear that the number of nodes is
> not scaling along with the number of users. If anything it appears to be
> inversely proportional.

Which is a huge problem.

Concretely, what O(n^2) scaling means is that the more Bitcoin is
adopted, the harder it is to use in a decentralized way that doesn't
trust others; the blocksize limit puts a cap on how centralized Bitcoin
can get in a given technological landscape.

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000007fc13ce02072d9cb2a6d51fae41fefcde7b3b283803d24

--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=lTgc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--