References: <24662b038abc45da7f3990e12a649b8a@airmail.cc>
	<55A66FA9.4010506@thinlink.com>
	<20150715151825.GB20029@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CDB5FC27-F3F0-44F7-BBC6-670ACAE740D2@gmail.com>
	<20150715155903.GC20029@savin.petertodd.org> <55A68668.6@bitcoins.info>
	<CAHUNwMp3-jNc9g0shCUCR76WEA5Qp+JpxZGPmAuK5wuy4p1yEw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150715193259.GC3064@muck>
	<CAHUNwMowbrua=iY518SL4MBY1sszfQwoM3epCaZ-jVrb2qxghg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150717115920.GA19616@savin.petertodd.org>
From: Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Message-ID: <55A8FB91.40506@bitcoins.info>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:56:49 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150717115920.GA19616@savin.petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Significant losses by double-spending unconfirmed
 transactions
Precedence: list

> My "relationships" are nothing more than people
> being willing to talk to me, ask me for advice, and warn me about
> possible threats. They're not legal contracts.

Your actions make it appear as if you attack companies with the hope of 
landing consulting fees.  I assume if companies hire you as a consultant 
or put you on some advisory board then you stop badmouthing them.  These 
type of developer attacks are a high risk issue due to the small number 
of developers who have been given authority by the github gatekeeper and 
the lack of an incentive system for Bitcoin devlelopers.

I have been suggesting a systematic risk analysis to reduce the 
probability of such an attack.  If you have a systematic risk analysis 
then when there are issue you judge it against a standard.  That 
replaces the current situation where developers haphazardly make claims 
in twitter, Reddit, and blog posts and create drama and confusion.

Russ