Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WJTrx-0005sR-0I for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:17:17 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of zikula.org designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.173; envelope-from=drak@zikula.org; helo=mail-we0-f173.google.com; Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WJTru-0003uF-VP for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:17:16 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w61so963385wes.4 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:17:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=stw2JvKdloLs16Mv9I+eVQRVz5CenroXq69cYSGKIqQ=; b=L+XZmXp3wL5dhfi0RKW8fnwzT7OQTvFnNVomIL8aa8VxcZh8e5f4zZAUjqY/bkkruU G0D7h5OAayHeO218WatMXS9yG30qjSfAGtlu/v69UzwMVoyCbZJFo0apYUTvem5sRm86 tlJfm4oESdaF8BqduZ0Dcfd/WEOOE7CSuJ9nOww5mgXoWdqKvGQZ9eskCRit3oZ4zGc0 Knq6P1Wu1IFQdLBXsL0yo9ChFq0uuSS493c8CugATADZUY5qr1t1+9Xu5Rnh3ZcPBAP3 CEDWxYWvvp85jsilTcAHaTkIxcga/NlXZXrT4fJUJAv3isNDwKeVA/16OBymEmQ5RQ1b q3FA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmFne95Q63LLIYqh5ddaSnLWtLbbBFEpVntUNYpWdphLXdDRfAJeMuwgGZhZDlEuYZ29by7 X-Received: by 10.194.204.229 with SMTP id lb5mr4148022wjc.67.1393618252500; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:10:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.205.69 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:10:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <530B8000.1070801@monetize.io> <20140228052523.GO3180@nl.grid.coop> From: Drak Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:10:32 +0000 Message-ID: To: "Warren Togami Jr." Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1WJTru-0003uF-VP Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:17:17 -0000 --047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 28 February 2014 14:42, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: > > https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d > > In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilobyte completely > failed to account for the actual cost to the network. If Bitcoin had > adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had no reason to join > Litecoin development last year. This is one of the few economic design > flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design. > Is there any particular reason that patch would not make it into bitcoin if submitted? Drak --047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2= 8 February 2014 14:42, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com>= wrote:

In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilo= byte completely failed to account for the actual cost to the network. =C2= =A0If Bitcoin had adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had n= o reason to join Litecoin development last year. =C2=A0This is one of the f= ew economic design flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design.

Is there any particular = reason that patch would not make it into bitcoin if submitted?
Drak=C2=A0
--047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4--