Return-Path: <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA03938
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:58:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D0F13E
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:58:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wmdw130 with SMTP id w130so48515465wmd.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:58:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=ymnTuA2Uvb/NkwUWbLVoHfsZsmNu8X+GKcNLBZ89V0Q=;
	b=aDcqGagZAmTdaPFVd7kNAr2Oqm4GxWm+JfI1MIt/h9o4l2jfyaaIoNqZiw2Lm/QI5X
	CaQQBJgo/RVBzjYFZNu1RG2JcY1igK6OlcjJkrVDnvu0GPtE/RYxcgyvAfH1+NxuGVgv
	6lsGCfG3avAD0GXYUvz6Wz5p/mS5LTOCVpTT64OgbKdpqh6bSWkiKIObE0df5DCCWgm5
	vAqN6Yw7J1/XtJqIidz8r/36XhjHxx7EltM35BoiMLdNzJ+ZiKCDdDXEp8qajoj1s0pl
	ZenZ/8TekvQof1x2FnrVs4mOmP+FpEgdDM/OTXCbOL0wenZkPXk49mkNenJlVn+n4LkG
	IsCg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.88.135 with SMTP id m129mr6951899wmb.67.1447459087144;
	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:58:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.212.79 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:58:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1581446.3ZPnhFUSFq@1337h4x0r>
References: <1581446.3ZPnhFUSFq@1337h4x0r>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:58:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CADm_WcZnOXqcse1LC28ptLyxXJTtbv+RPMfrMamR4xZK3xcK8Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
To: xor@freenetproject.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11443518b75be2052474d43c
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Contradiction in BIP65 text?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:58:13 -0000

--001a11443518b75be2052474d43c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, xor via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> This clearly says that funds can be frozen.
> Can the BIP65-thing be used to freeze funds or can it not be?
>


This language definitely trips up or worries several folks - it's been
mentioned a few times before.

The user _chooses_ to freeze _their own_ funds.  It is not an unwilling act
of force, which many assume when they see the phrase "freeze funds."

--001a11443518b75be2052474d43c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, xor via bitcoin-dev <span=
 dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" t=
arget=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote=
:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pad=
ding-left:1ex">This clearly says that funds can be frozen.<br>
Can the BIP65-thing be used to freeze funds or can it not be?<br></blockquo=
te><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>This language definitely trips up or =
worries several folks - it&#39;s been mentioned a few times before.</div><d=
iv><br></div><div>The user _chooses_ to freeze _their own_ funds.=C2=A0 It =
is not an unwilling act of force, which many assume when they see the phras=
e &quot;freeze funds.&quot;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div>=
</div>

--001a11443518b75be2052474d43c--