Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Oct 2025 09:33:17 -0700
Sender: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pete@petertodd.org designates 103.168.172.154 as permitted sender) client-ip=103.168.172.154;
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 16:12:27 +0000
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Cc: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea
Message-ID: <aN_16-lBQzY5K9XL@petertodd.org>
References: <GDC-d847c0e8-4e35-40c5-87e7-2ab89e13ea09@google.com>
 <CAJowKgLE4kb7qT1NxXrmEssr8+fQGd-=7=m-BAsjePoti8TRRg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1DWaoic6QFm8QfWd"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKgLE4kb7qT1NxXrmEssr8+fQGd-=7=m-BAsjePoti8TRRg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bitcoindev@googlegroups.com; contact bitcoindev+owners@googlegroups.com


--1DWaoic6QFm8QfWd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 05:09:15PM -0700, Erik Aronesty wrote:
> A soft fork could introduce a new opcode, `OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH`, allowing
> miners to optionally commit a deterministic hash of the current UTXO set
> into a block. If present, all nodes must verify its correctness or reject
> the block; if absent, the block is still valid. Old nodes treat the opcode
> as unspendable, so backward compatibility is preserved.
> 
> Because computing the full UTXO root is costly, this makes each checkpoint
> intentionally expensive to produce, ensuring that miners will only include
> them when compensated with sufficient fees. Additionally, it could be
> limited to one per block.

No, it's costly for everyone to compute: everyone needs to recompute this to
validate that the block is valid.

Anyway, just as an aside, if you really need to do something like this, make
the commitment be computable in advance by using a UTXO set root from the
*prior* interval, to give nodes plenty of time to compute it. I outlined this
approach before in the form of delayed txo commitments:

https://petertodd.org/2016/delayed-txo-commitments

-- 
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/aN_16-lBQzY5K9XL%40petertodd.org.

--1DWaoic6QFm8QfWd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=bTy1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1DWaoic6QFm8QfWd--