Return-Path: <thomas@thomaszander.se>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85DCB4D3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 22:13:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from manxnetsf05.manx.net (outbound.manx.net [213.137.31.12])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F688E8
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 22:13:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from adsl92.39.203.140.manx.net (EHLO coldstorage.localnet)
	([92.39.203.140])
	by manxnetsf05.manx.net (MOS 4.4.5a-GA FastPath queued)
	with ESMTP id EGD54495; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 23:13:55 +0100 (BST)
From: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:13:54 +0200
Message-ID: <8181630.GdAj0CPZYc@coldstorage>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDoz4NMEQuQj6UHCYYCwihZrEC4Az8xDvTBwiZDf9eQ7-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T16fH+56isq95m4+QWsKwP==tf75ep8ghnEcBoV4OtZJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDpwMQzju+Gsoe3qMi60MPr7OAiSuigy3RdA1xh-SwFzbw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDoz4NMEQuQj6UHCYYCwihZrEC4Az8xDvTBwiZDf9eQ7-w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 92.39.203.140 coldstorage.localnet
	thomas@thomaszander.se 5 none
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=manxnetsf05.manx.net
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown,
	refid=str=0001.0A0B0206.55C92223.0098, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000,
	reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0,
	so=2014-07-29 09:23:55, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32,
	mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
	refid=str=0001.0A0B0206.55C92223.0098, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000,
	reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0,
	so=2014-07-29 09:23:55, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 1d0b4c36cb3b39a7afaf456daeb455b9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 22:13:57 -0000

On Monday 10. August 2015 13.55.03 Jorge Tim=F3n via bitcoin-dev wrote:=

> Gavin, I interpret the absence of response to these questions as a
> sign that everybody agrees that  there's no other reason to increase
> the consensus block size other than to avoid minimum market fees from=

> rising (above zero).
> Feel free to correct that notion at any time by answering the
> questions yourself.
> In fact if any other "big block size advocate" thinks there's more
> reason I would like to hear their reasons too.

See my various emails in the last hour.
--=20
Thomas Zander