Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.175; envelope-from=grarpamp@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-we0-f175.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201205020931.01718.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <1335808239.18613.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<CALf2ePx_+SaANDfvyuTpv=M8rquvjAqSGV5+Uo=wkYKb-oOrLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP17H-E0mWGGjNS2i0079LuRJ9MnVHSPjR_ots2LR7j9bA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201205020931.01718.luke@dashjr.org>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 12:21:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti2_AUG7zmhwrg1GK9iDOgAh5RNrSEGvJefWCc0Uo=-GQbw@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
Precedence: list

> While Bitcoin-Qt is by far the best client

This is purely subjective. One's best is another's worst.

> These are both things which are particular
> suitable to clear objective enumeration.

Yes, so for the purposes of compiling a list of clients
and libraries, please just stick to a table of features.

On the subjective part, I'm finding the library+client
implementations to be nice, and indeed the future.
Afaik, there are two major pairs of these so far that
should be listed. Ymmv.

Can someone also please set the reply-to header
for these lists. It's really annoying to hit reply and
not have the list address show up. Thanks :)