Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3FCC000B for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 17:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D920403C1 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 17:35:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HgyDOijyslnI for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 17:35:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-yw1-x112a.google.com (mail-yw1-x112a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112a]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A7CD4038C for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 17:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw1-x112a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-2dc585dbb02so77113227b3.13 for ; Sun, 06 Mar 2022 09:35:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=04zKFjykng+70+a/Qznskim2unfzuqClBlhn8lZxzQU=; b=QE9zDJz4+TuEJY63zb3xYYckcLgI/n9+DuFzsET3ULfhBW+OFz6b4xlgBeTDYoe0W8 l+Z91G+Xzvf9c+61NZ4lPIoE4wIizuaETAWRuOadbLfK6+g6MZW0GfQGipPfjkogOGSB eY9SH07EgegBSD2cIA5Fv3tJFsz9kiRKRYofdJQ8wXUOZ4NzJXbtzBEpR03Yg5a8stxn ai4CG87A3oHBJEIGLZJooPgO430ZdZkr0xz7rk4UI7t0bwtUJlGh7eLrg2zvYWIK09wc w9X4PpOAedC2IJ6rrX8RemfwkszR0iKjTkZVXC4DAZ5EK/kAI3Pfi+I5HNaXm5mgzK2y 3CWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=04zKFjykng+70+a/Qznskim2unfzuqClBlhn8lZxzQU=; b=gxC7g8e1XlbvUgwzk0hfbBkEnGsTm6WTBarTMaDcpxVgASyk7TRZPMWyyVeq8Fx0KJ 5i/cnbbaTjGAIv1Rob7UicvANmCXE/AiftZzhXd8J3ai+OpnVWAP86E/kNos0HpwOf2F WeF5JX0D97vPRmp3RaEpIdeWMYOdbnD9N7V3NkLxiUcgb0A1TwiO287tapFZw5/DPqXI of+s+qNdffscHWWHeIZ/RBxSbs9tZh2FL14rcKkZvMOW8m1SsapdrjeCN8JpLKtMWavt Yrp+HZFdcqC5j4zBmy0VF2e8CCHM05SYy4xp32IEqhn1ATXJh/lWMB2c1uvQf0ouJ5Wc xa3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rlmO6MkJZogcW5k+gF9PYeYZ/nolMk3J4Y2HSME+woOk+31CY tkxicCZ8D7iYjB+IW6MBXvt5I403fkCvS5mXvzfQz1K3skg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3vLqfgavYzQ17HGUzWLLFtXj/YedaI8H/qPAdj4ViHKisQx093qA2ep8Csr47JPrcROgI+knySOT36HnbIcE= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:fcc4:0:b0:2d6:6912:1afa with SMTP id m187-20020a0dfcc4000000b002d669121afamr5951617ywf.61.1646588127838; Sun, 06 Mar 2022 09:35:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "James O'Beirne" Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 12:35:17 -0500 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007386fe05d9902cdc" Subject: [bitcoin-dev] CTV vaults in the wild X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2022 17:35:30 -0000 --0000000000007386fe05d9902cdc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" A few months ago, AJ wrote[0] > I'm not really convinced CTV is ready to start trying to deploy > on mainnet even in the next six months; I'd much rather see some real > third-party experimentation *somewhere* public first In the spirit of real third-party experimentation *somewhere* in public, I've created this implementation and write-up of a simple vault design using CTV. https://github.com/jamesob/simple-ctv-vault I think it has a number of appealing characteristics for custody operations at any size. Regards, James [0]: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-February/019920.html --0000000000007386fe05d9902cdc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A few months ago, AJ wrote[0]

> I'm not real= ly convinced CTV is ready to start trying to deploy
> on mainnet even= in the next six months; I'd much rather see some real
> third-pa= rty experimentation *somewhere* public first

In the spirit of real t= hird-party experimentation *somewhere* in public,
I've created this = implementation and write-up of a simple vault design
using CTV.

= =C2=A0 =C2=A0https:= //github.com/jamesob/simple-ctv-vault

I think it has a numb= er of appealing characteristics for custody
operations at an= y size.

Regards,
James


[0]: h= ttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-February/019920= .html
--0000000000007386fe05d9902cdc--