Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jameson.lopp@gmail.com>) id 1Wi81L-0005IC-95
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 07 May 2014 20:00:51 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.216.52 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.216.52; envelope-from=jameson.lopp@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-qa0-f52.google.com; 
Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Wi81K-00044y-62
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 07 May 2014 20:00:51 +0000
Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id cm18so1551105qab.39
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 07 May 2014 13:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.224.160.142 with SMTP id n14mr70342933qax.17.1399492844464; 
	Wed, 07 May 2014 13:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.119.214] (BRONTO-SOFT.car1.Raleigh1.Level3.net.
	[4.59.160.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	h78sm21234541qgd.10.2014.05.07.13.00.43 for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 07 May 2014 13:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <536A90EC.3000205@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 16:00:44 -0400
From: Jameson Lopp <jameson.lopp@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
References: <536A8592.8010009@gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP1A0z0sVBHzW_2Z1RJ6STX9G1RW_KncbY_yN7NuTL8BZw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1A0z0sVBHzW_2Z1RJ6STX9G1RW_KncbY_yN7NuTL8BZw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(jameson.lopp[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Wi81K-00044y-62
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcing the Statoshi fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 20:00:51 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I completely agree that this setup is far too difficult to reasonably expect anyone to implement it. You're correct that we could run a single StatsD daemon and have quite a few nodes sending statistics to it - this is really what StatsD was designed for - sampling small amounts of stats from high volume systems. There would be an issue of trust, however - StatsD was also only really designed to be run inside of highly secure infrastructure where you trust all of the machines that are talking to it.

- - Jameson

On 05/07/2014 03:50 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Really nice! We definitely need to put together a team who really cares
> about the operations side of the network and this is a fantastic start.
> 
> It'd be nice if you didn't assume knowledge of what statsd is out of the
> box. Given the name I'd assumed it was a small UNIX daemon but it seems
> it's actually a Javascript thingy?
> 
> It looks like putting together a monitored bitcoind setup can be quite a
> lot of work. I wonder if there are ways to simplify it. For example, would
> it make sense for someone to run a community statsd and graphite instance,
> so we can get aggregate statistics across many nodes and the node operators
> don't have to set everything up themselves? Does that make any sense?
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTapDsAAoJEIch3FSFNiDcqNMIAKbliLXVJ+CovCB+etqwCYfD
oTs0uxEIZvnGSzqn6i3z4tgzF7kbnpVThiHpG2MO2BytasGzfr+FsDLFpvkkvx0Q
yffa1J5uB5QhY/POwg6GCN4DEmy8tbd+I5rSTKg1m/JuXZV2B4TFgr6GF+t+gBNT
O2TTIngcl77XbGDF2XKOZSAHaIFx2KjdZNg5lfInVxDeA1dDzlU/vmEB37fx80EH
IzD7FTllLp5qhlwYxaQTVxXmbjy+pXbtArYsVSRgoscgJI3DDKpxQj3uzjxouEHv
27QkhuS2dzFioQhLPcnz/PtcCkE1l0aDNf6n7OiJ3lGygQ0+AKZHpyuvFujpSY8=
=QCYI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----