Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1SZNiZ-0006Ta-Ob
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 29 May 2012 14:48:15 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1SZNiO-0005zf-Ku for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 29 May 2012 14:48:15 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [97.96.85.141])
	(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE20F56059A;
	Tue, 29 May 2012 14:47:56 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 14:47:28 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.12-gentoonestfix-intelwr; KDE/4.8.1; x86_64;
	; )
References: <CA+8xBpdBe4yR6xkCODL6JQ41Gyx9eWcGGGvcQVt7DCmaEnAhbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMGNxUv3jX+bdEyF8p-y3i93yLySxyT=7Qy336dPw9vgDKG51w@mail.gmail.com>
	<5C824F0D-6025-4630-965B-E6C685588250@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C824F0D-6025-4630-965B-E6C685588250@mac.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <201205291447.29823.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1SZNiO-0005zf-Ku
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 14:48:15 -0000

On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 8:52:49 AM Michael Gr=F8nager wrote:
> The format of the sla.php page should then be specified too - but it could
> be a json-rpc call returning a json object like (as result): {
>     sla_version: "0.1",
>     accept_no_fee_tx: false,
>     min_fee: 50000,
>     big_tx_fee: 10000, // extra fee pr kb
> }
> I guess miners could work out a more suitable set of fees...

Please not JSON, and not hard-coded logic. Bitcoin already has a secure=20
scripting system - perhaps we can decide on an initial stack format and run=
 a=20
script retrieved from the URI?