Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.223.176 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.223.176; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ie0-f176.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJAe9MeO+Sr0+2BRwu3q-Be5JQt_s_xdnBBEcquXqOyxcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54876653.4020403@certimix.com> <548769FA.5040406@bluematt.me>
	<CA+s+GJAe9MeO+Sr0+2BRwu3q-Be5JQt_s_xdnBBEcquXqOyxcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:21:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJA0BDMaa2+A7QJdz08Ck4PFQcXs2dg22hi5PCMsGu7dqw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] ACK NACK utACK "Concept ACK"
Precedence: list

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Abbreviations:
>
> Concept ACK -> agree with the idea and overall direction, but haven't
> reviewed the code changes nor tested it
> utACK -> reviewed the code changes, but did not put it through any testing
> Tested ACK -> reviewed the code changes and verified the functionality/bug fix

And there is also NACK, that's an aspecific 'I wouldn't like this
merged'. I always explain why in the text.

A document on this would be welcome, as it may look like Martian to
outsiders. That's been brought up many times before, but no one ever
created it.

Wladimir