Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 341D5516
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 16 Aug 2018 01:07:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DEC189
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 16 Aug 2018 01:07:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [2001:470:5:265:a45d:823b:2d27:961c] (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:a45d:823b:2d27:961c])
	(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5FB038ABE66;
	Thu, 16 Aug 2018 01:06:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:180816:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::n8bKAluAzicV4xiy:B4BW
X-Hashcash: 1:25:180816:ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com::f2kHDJPsHkqnkS8t:b+Peu
X-Hashcash: 1:25:180816:judecn@gmail.com::yesVwXxnUknOyKRs:dIHLK
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 01:06:53 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748)
References: <CACrqygD_5jpkTvvcFo7eHxZfiH4evzZQc=YB=opBo6M_0EsZTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFsQEP1ttFbAZZzz49Jg3E3jbZjztNRDVGJAKOWULYzrn+7obQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACrqygBJ=RdPpHqHzPNqqj0V2w5XL6GVtKobOWnj1EsVykUS8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACrqygBJ=RdPpHqHzPNqqj0V2w5XL6GVtKobOWnj1EsVykUS8w@mail.gmail.com>
X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201808160106.54960.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Claiming an OP_RETURN Prefix
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 01:07:47 -0000

On Wednesday 15 August 2018 21:54:50 Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev wrot=
e:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:24 PM Jude Nelson via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Can a miner identify which transactions came from your software simply =
by
> > running a copy themselves?  If so, then they can censor your transactio=
ns
> > no matter how you encode them.
>
> Possibly, but in the IPFS case I suspect the latency required to inspect
> all hashes would likely  impact the ability of the miner to succeed in the
> block. (True? I don=E2=80=99t touch mining software.)

Not true at all.

> Thus as long as all hashes look the same, and there are multiple content
> addressable schemes that use hashes that have to be searched in order to
> know to censor, you have to censor all or none.

Choosing not to mine transactions is not censorship.

Luke