From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
To: "David Barnes | Bitcoin Co. Ltd." <david.barnes@bitcoin.co.th>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:24:24 -0400
Message-ID: <15824042.UJUZ1yd9UW@crushinator>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.0.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.10; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <55A8C1EF.8050603@bitcoin.co.th>
References: <55A867B9.202@bitcoin.co.th>
	<CAAmoQf113y=Xd9R+b5yS=d9yo5SAX8+Nrv3gQt-R7Jih0UBOBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<55A8C1EF.8050603@bitcoin.co.th>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP0074 Draft (Dynamic Rate Lookup)
Precedence: list

You should rename your file to something like "bip-draft-dynamic-rate-lookup". Using an arbitrary BIP number will cause confusion when that BIP number is actually assigned later.


On Friday, 17 July 2015, at 3:50 pm, David Barnes | Bitcoin Co. Ltd. via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I picked up the next available number myself, but can be changed to 
> anything, the 74 is unimportant to the proposal.
> 
> David Barnes
> 
> On 7/17/2015 2:54 PM, Micha Bailey wrote:
> > Did Greg assign this number? He didn't do it here on the ML. You're 
> > not supposed to use arbitrary numbers, certainly not numbers that are 
> > close/similar to ones already assigned.
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev