Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YVwj4-0000GB-EW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:36:10 +0000 Received: from nm33-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([72.30.239.202]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YVwj2-0004J2-Qk for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:36:10 +0000 Received: from [66.196.81.170] by nm33.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2015 06:36:03 -0000 Received: from [98.139.215.253] by tm16.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2015 06:36:03 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1066.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2015 06:36:03 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 483562.85830.bm@omp1066.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: uvA9YMAVM1nT75T8OK9lplRaN.y5RUALx7ad11M6EuowXcljXFVttzXD5LMOHOh G1YOWM_HkE1qvVesM0ylBhHMdt97WcKHaP92tQ4Y15hCLdMvvc0aenpWXg2VUN6autEGSMMa_Xs8 Pk0Fp6W_d7SkMgULT.I.TxW6mM7KUY7z8UdbMUtDXtCv4YNxK.vA9kMdcgj8f4lqn3liRs25pXCq klYD0TM.duGwVJpCQycIVPOhegz4WxkddETr47NJHIRCyM7w5M6i4hSVhh1rZEgoZquItm9VsSJC DykFG49oIuLlOyeP9JZbDvPOaOZ.d.VSxUIO6s4EvnzgtwRbkwAjCSCKXGCBXc8sdOB3LQDRTz.g E_gODABXapwLduPIROhZL1Fpdjf82B1p9IMK1cn6rUobD4y90RbSoPasMnFjDVFeeNV4VxMkvj_k 1bO7IyjsKWq_0m1FicdrfczsFsll.i63SyKtCWstS.W6YLDPhGhFVEGQ6mrMSsdAiQWdgXwWGNJ9 XZxJ3pr.vmqElhmipK9T3Mtzi6WD8B0Ha0W5jkAkudkXyq1odGJh7.MYiII3nparouOTAtmo38M0 bNaN26KK2q5wpa9MnTvYcH90TWNgwPvum Received: by 76.13.26.66; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:36:02 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:36:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Thy Shizzle To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Message-ID: <1222461224.5719.1426142162445.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5718_282952045.1426142162443" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [72.30.239.202 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (harro84[at]yahoo.com.au) 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (harro84[at]yahoo.com.au) 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1YVwj2-0004J2-Qk Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Testnet3 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Thy Shizzle List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:36:10 -0000 ------=_Part_5718_282952045.1426142162443 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Strangely enough, it has started to work properly and I didn't even touch m= y code just had it sitting there in the loop/ping circuit it was performing= and capturing with wireshark.....that is quite odd! "Hi, so I have my .NET node communicating on the P2P network just fine, so = I figured as I'll now start looking at making and validating transactions e= tc I should probably migrate to test net. Now I see that we are up to the t= hird generation testnet testnet3, and I am sending my messages now using pa= cket magic 0x0b110907 and I'm using Wireshark and I can confirm that my mes= sages are going out with that packet magic. Now what is interesting is that when I try connect to a test node obtained = from DNS seed testnet-seed.bitcoin.petertodd.org, I send it a version messa= ge with the testnet3 packet magic, yet I get no verack or version in respon= se???? In fact, the only thing I get back is a ping and then the connection= is severed by the=C2=A0remote node. What is going on? Also, it works fine with the=C2=A0mainnet packet magic va= lue of 0x0f9beb4d9 and I am debuging my code and ensuring it is looking for= the testnet3 packet magic, but I am not getting a response from the node?" ------=_Part_5718_282952045.1426142162443 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Strangely enough, it has started to work properly = and I didn't even touch my code just had it sitting there in the loop/ping = circuit it was performing and capturing with wireshark.....that is quite od= d!


"Hi, so I have my .NET node communicating on the P= 2P network just fine, so I figured as I'll now start looking at making and = validating transactions etc I should probably migrate to test net. Now I se= e that we are up to the third generation testnet testnet3, and I am sending= my messages now using packet magic 0x0b110907 and I'm using Wireshark and = I can confirm that my messages are going out with that packet magic.
<= div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1426122660566_26031" dir=3D"ltr">
Now what is interesting i= s that when I try connect to a test node obtained from DNS seed testnet-see= d.bitcoin.petertodd.org, I send it a version message with the testnet3 pack= et magic, yet I get no verack or version in response???? In fact, the only = thing I get back is a ping and then the connection is severed by the r= emote node.
<= br>
What is g= oing on? Also, it works fine with the mainnet packet magic value of 0x= 0f9beb4d9 and I am debuging my code and ensuring it is looking for the test= net3 packet magic, but I am not getting a response from the node?"
------=_Part_5718_282952045.1426142162443--