Message-ID: <55E2B452.3090402@riseup.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:44:18 -0700
From: odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>, 
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
References: <CA+1nnrnybS7u_9F46rEbnsPa1UDCMTau3X6SDahstawPzmXEjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D6B653.6050108@riseup.net>
	<CALxbBHWvXjrUeeryArYQkgGT6kY-XpOzm4yUY5TUjC4jz+F0xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADm_Wcb-M=hxcAvb4JS_AeuGYgjs=Xdyc0o0SR3o9R1xheHv1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALxbBHWqoK38tn_F3LTKi=6i55rhuZKOy=UDgy3SQr39hm+EGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALxbBHWqoK38tn_F3LTKi=6i55rhuZKOy=UDgy3SQr39hm+EGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>,
	Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RE : Visualizations of Votes
Precedence: list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This is looking very good also (you've already seen it, but just
adding it to thread):

https://data.bitcoinity.org/bitcoin/block_size_votes/7d?c=block_size_vot
es&r=hour&t=bar
(site by Kacper Cieśla (comboy))

On 08/25/2015 01:46 AM, Christian Decker wrote:
> Yes, the two dimensions are orthogonal: BIP 100 support and actual
> size voting. However there seem to be a few pools which simply vote
> to support BIP100, without specifying a desired block size [1],
> hence I started tracking both on the same chart, maybe I'll split
> them into different charts to clarify.
> 
> Regards, Chris
> 
> [1]
> https://blockchain.info/tx/ba1e5d21a340772d637ee5dc0bde8072ad1a7b499ba
241d5bfaae9618749531e
>
>  On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:46 PM Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com 
> <mailto:jgarzik@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> There is a duplicated column.
> 
> BIP 100 voting is /BV\d+/
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev 
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org 
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> 
> I hacked together a simple tracking page for the 'block votes', it
> currently includes the 8MB vote and XT, as well as the /BV\d+/ vote
> for generic size: http://bitcoinstats.com/network/votes/
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:25 AM odinn via bitcoin-dev 
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org 
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> 
> Hello Nicolas,
> 
> On 08/20/2015 08:49 PM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>> A visualization I would like to see would include:
> 
>>> pie graph(s) of what % are voting for (BIP 100, BIP 101,
> 8MB, BIP
>>> sipa
>> etc) based on what's published in blocks.
> 
>> If such a vote existed, I would gladly show the pie on
> BIPxDevs.
>> However there is no standard way for miners to vote
> informally BIP
>> they support.
> 
> What about formal votes? Is there a way to visually have them
> appear in a pie chart as the votes become apparent in blocks?
> 
> I appreciate good visualizations and am trying to get a (visual) 
> comparison of the votes on these competing proposals.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing
>> list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing
> list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org 
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> 
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing
> list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org 
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> 
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> 
> 

- -- 
http://abis.io ~
"a protocol concept to enable decentralization
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
https://keybase.io/odinn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV4rRSAAoJEGxwq/inSG8C7gIIALRgWbwf447+B202oUOmtGW6
1CVBJX415PyOmBLqbKBgIRLhQm3rOa0WRcjYejHM2PJLz2XIAyLouOoxiy+rcwX4
yIqEX33El+evgDpFZPjHUYq15mMtP0+jnzwZvyYrCP41m1MUoXwOWDYnf8X+q4yb
h2eiApU4fRJmzDYWWzVmoWTYFEzjmNW95vSOTSCFxuvx2A6227vyJI1irQ9EDi7+
UVdvNqTIXTmNDDJBmIsUeWkSe7fAkgyejxD2S08zEUuLR8w3S+9JYJ0rDTMkl4PR
EEnuL1M34WMuT7uQIjeQ/5L3voMefKAjCcwiX/lvk2G+YKXXhQhqNy1uyPfJgyI=
=YUJa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----