Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052B9BA2 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 01:34:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com (mail-oi0-f41.google.com [209.85.218.41]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23A26187 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 01:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id r203so71251500oib.3 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 18:34:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=d2gJELBVWXKBQs7M1fJlSoOdwRoMs7s5E9G3pBGbOdk=; b=MkLmjiOsRt840pCkEGgnKyw5qJC+WikDgkp0vXMcieL1lL/QcUeQeWxizZbw/nAia6 /rgGHlCgygjD8rwhjvBnDGUECN13BAStRwe4SmXVo3Q5IsWqbX8louKOTpUk5q006RtQ /OdUndsW2LSKsa2StsGuwUIOT3zFwBpJEId4AK0HYoYeS/KUsYfpw2MoayVw1ZY3+gPz Hf4e9oBUB575bLCgD7vqY6di8kH9CC14Jk/IzqG+QHn0nRVIEyR+mB23mw0xfAS09kCF P/V+DrGxGfDXiG2hZN53O44mRaEfcGSEyZPhCSV0fQo6VdC9bRejtM4n99GBSutTs+8L Kq6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=d2gJELBVWXKBQs7M1fJlSoOdwRoMs7s5E9G3pBGbOdk=; b=go3pZ/1q7Yv9jRS0Rg/WwQ6ZHdRuBwcJg+AEYj4sTTHqXXbwZwfpsUGAm9B8ZjYIIV 0xk7BBIVYvumfriVG0W1/rbPEy+Yp33daFTTjzMciepFbBkyacXvpd7hSq4VdHvzHdX+ cQ7hdh7NKTXxl+U2pS+zmyU0L6pAV1EiAxRuLv5QVha0pEGCk9QnkF1Y582guOyA5LwA cJttHWxrKoLC+6Ii0d7ZUaymvt7lGrFa4OA9ZFBZYjRhRygmw3xE+BQ0Bj1PT+LbpskB goItJ/OKDog2GqgpLcuRtMMNS6Hv2VS4Tm3LHl/NxbURYVXZmuxIcSGunxXSTYy5cF7W wOoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5ZbWnkQn14W2AJpuGqXZRx3IEqCnnNgsYVtRpuwpoL+Y84n8RqGDwwUW/O+Dq5o5mAXpVSY+dIBtGhDQ== X-Received: by 10.202.4.18 with SMTP id 18mr2430111oie.180.1491528878279; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 18:34:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.14.103 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 18:34:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniele Pinna Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 03:34:17 +0200 Message-ID: To: Gregory Maxwell , Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113c2516f667cb054c89a01c X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 01:42:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Inhibiting a covert attack on the Bitcoin POW function X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 01:34:43 -0000 --001a113c2516f667cb054c89a01c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Can you please not forget to supply us more details on the claims made regarding the reverse engineering of the Asic chip? It is absolutely crucial that we get these independently verified ASAP. Daniele Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 21:38:31 +0000 > From: Gregory Maxwell > To: Bitcoin Dev > Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Inhibiting a covert attack on > the Bitcoin POW function > Message-ID: > gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > each block MUST either contain a BIP-141 segwit commitment or a > > correct WTXID commitment with ID 0xaa21a9ef. > It was just pointed out to me that the proposed ID (which I just > selected to be above the segwit one) collides with one chosen in > another non-BIP proposal. This wasn't intentional, and I'll happily > change the value when I update the document. --001a113c2516f667cb054c89a01c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can you please not forget to supply us more details on th= e claims made regarding the reverse engineering of the Asic chip?

It= is absolutely crucial that we get these independently verified ASAP.
=

Daniele

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 21:38:31 +0000
= From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org= >
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfound= ation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Inhibiting a co= vert attack on
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 the=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Bitcoin POW function
Message-ID:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <<= span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">CAAS2fgSTrMjKZVpL4wRidnzTCC9O3OEF=3DoCnROf1pggz2cDgJA@mail.gmail.com= >
Content-Type: text/plain; c= harset=3DUTF-8
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org> wrote:
> each block MUST either contain a BIP-141 segwit commitment or= a
> correct WTXID commitment= with ID 0xaa21a9ef.
It was just pointed out to me that the proposed ID (which I= just
selected to be above the s= egwit one) collides with one chosen in
another non-BIP proposal.=C2=A0 This wasn't intentional, and I&#= 39;ll happily
change the value w= hen I update the document.
=C2=A0
=
--001a113c2516f667cb054c89a01c--