Return-Path: <jgarzik@gmail.com> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9225B171B for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:50:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECED2F for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so23564800wic.0 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:50:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZeRP0LYfA3820wPaIESuPdgcLxndLtSVR7X+EdooepM=; b=omWlzcflhBwaM4MbU4kvHNoLdGq69HgfR54iYyPSVv6lNRvQJFTMLEFQ2dbs17e9i5 gCujWe+VCEuT/9ZdU7EkAJCFrwPGMjTScVxqJcCJ0FAWrk1aNUF0vC08hZHOL7SeKplq YbLkg4Gt6fLFOGQh4Hzt2ZB3b0gmExCLuwpqNrOlLMemBkmAjEZ2VuSGzL2H0HKzTakx Wh8U5OAUxeU7w45CEuEHjBkAd0OxFvFTP2l/x2Ct9VMfC9YID7jfT1/i3x8BVfQNPplm xziJCEnaSS221XPQSsNNV1YYOIFDN1NzAD7bX6ck4nc5GsZsrP2PLltCXiYePhFopPLx j5bg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.88.4 with SMTP id bc4mr2814714wib.68.1443696635659; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.158.9 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 03:50:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <CAAUq4861Wd2c42gVy7SoW9414R8RGY+Yzp7rDtzagrwQewnFWg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20150924112555.GA21355@amethyst.visucore.com> <201509301757.44035.luke@dashjr.org> <20151001085058.GA10010@amethyst.visucore.com> <CAAUq486=TisNp0MbFjWYdCsyVX-qx5dV_KKZuNR7Jp63KNWeiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADJgMzuDPoQacdrH7n_ajwuYLMZ4-Z19KZSa=w=rLhmOkJhfQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAUq484+g89yD+s7iR_mGWPM3TTN7V6-EPb1ig=P1BKfcbztPg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAUq4861Wd2c42gVy7SoW9414R8RGY+Yzp7rDtzagrwQewnFWg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:50:35 -0400 Message-ID: <CADm_WcY-t+pGFGVeiy1XAKKYJ6ULfa8AmLB_+QCxcPdkp_84bA@mail.gmail.com> From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com> To: Marcel Jamin <marcel@jamin.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428ee421ca0a052108d154 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:50:37 -0000 --f46d04428ee421ca0a052108d154 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is <1.0.0 > I've said the same thing years ago. Originally the "1.0" was a target for whenever "client mode" as planned by Satoshi was implemented, making the Bitcoin Core implementation feature-complete for as a minimum working/viable project. Ultimately it is not so important and tends to generate a lot of discussion - so maybe we should just do the emacs thing and go from 0.12 to 12.0 for next version. --f46d04428ee421ca0a052108d154 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-d= ev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundatio= n.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></spa= n> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockqu= ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s= olid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">I guess the question then becomes w= hy bitcoin still is <1.0.0</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'v= e said the same thing years ago.=C2=A0 Originally the "1.0" was a= target for whenever "client mode" as planned by Satoshi was impl= emented, making the Bitcoin Core implementation feature-complete for as a m= inimum working/viable project.</div><div><br></div><div>Ultimately it is no= t so important and tends to generate a lot of discussion =C2=A0- so maybe w= e should just do the emacs thing and go from 0.12 to 12.0 for next version.= </div><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div></div> --f46d04428ee421ca0a052108d154--