Return-Path: Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C520BC0052 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 03:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE000204CF for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 03:10:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2-JR6EqD40G for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 03:10:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91BD2204B4 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 03:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 4CGsnM5GQ2z9sTL; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:10:47 +1100 (AEDT) From: Rusty Russell To: Mike Schmidt , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion , Pieter Wuille In-Reply-To: References: <87imblmutl.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20201008145938.vrmm33f6sugdc7qm@ganymede> <87r1q0e06p.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <877drn2g6q.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <878sc120f5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20201020102952.4iwpugi5dxawufgo@ganymede> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:21:34 +1030 Message-ID: <87pn5cxju1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: John Barboza Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Progress on bech32 for future Segwit Versions (BIP-173) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 03:10:54 -0000 Mike Schmidt via bitcoin-dev writes: > I am happy to re-test the services Harding listed previously for v1 send > support next week. > > Suggestions of additional services that would be valuable to test are > welcome as well. Thanks! I am a little disappointed that I won't get to ask Bitcoin Twitter to send tips to Pieter[1] though... I would like to hear from the services who currently support v1+ (who thus *would* have to change their software) whether they have a technical preference for option 1 or 2. Cheers, Rusty. [1] Or just maybe, tips to some random miner...