Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94BCC002B for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CFC821EB for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:03:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org A1CFC821EB Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=H/kgoAii X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.602 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H8wlO5abnTHy for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:03:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 5A78E820A4 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A78E820A4 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6BF32000CC; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:02:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 04 Feb 2023 11:02:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1675526579; x=1675612979; bh=rQzutC53lJhButSN+3goPVIeU1+m MViYh6VF+8ZYGDE=; b=H/kgoAiiGRCUJILBEtSWKHqDzSYpA2m1NuB/Ly798n3E odL6SOeJqTGV5GyPf8Yf72/ESkucXLY5hb7jtJZwmoijGI7ROuDDEIPtnQ4u6qRE aDaZ+BLaQkbXwqZ5Rw/wZa5UoVhpDJC89vapoSa6jgaQm2Pwo1htcrzUODRZGiVf aFdDXPfxFSdsYxTy1Qps18zJbJKkGYut47UQiT/FsChSYcdwWOpzFrpZOy2BPVpS KCpSPAnrBB3WZE9a11ifv//lT0xt2KIoNxTM8smkCO9ioR7lmOjpk/XEWONEK347 OEJEGDFL9BsY4na1UzJApLua/8G6UYLZyL5YakOxVQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudegvddgkeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedttdegtdffteeukeffhfffkeekiefhteduvdetjeeujeffgeevgefhudetjefh veenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgvthgv sehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:02:58 -0500 (EST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F042B5F879; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:02:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:02:45 -0500 From: Peter Todd To: Greg Sanders Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JLElgrE3zW7o3WpY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ephemeral Anchors: Fixing V3 Package RBF againstpackage limit pinning X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 16:03:04 -0000 --JLElgrE3zW7o3WpY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:07:29PM -0500, Greg Sanders wrote: > I'm not particularly persuaded, but also not wedded to either idea. >=20 > Fixed up tests for the OP_TRUE case here: > https://github.com/instagibbs/bitcoin/tree/ephemeral-anchors-true Thanks. Looking through that, I think a lot of those test cases don't actually need= to be changed to OP_2, as they aren't trying to test anything related to standardness. --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --JLElgrE3zW7o3WpY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE0RcYcKRzsEwFZ3N5Lly11TVRLzcFAmPegaMACgkQLly11TVR LzcgEA//a01ukQpaeeUyl7MYDsGg/c+XX5co70+6xQVjBvPJ9pmu7GD/sDuVCfac CWOTe1M+2V4PtrOza1fAzXhgFy3xtTTFD08w4czddgdjftg8WvCEMqx5GupZUKNz lxseUQpIIEKEKhhqYOTtbK+zZWz19+mQVb3F3OBU2BLs9twERAxSvA3xMy5stYX7 UemyzwPbY61ON+RYni7uStonMNVW+saGCCvSc6jRWbb5MlnPqkkuZF54RRKcki5r W0QM2D+TlYnsdIfs6Qhl70eI0Ci4tY6UfcjJ5RMgr6VAyGZVGvf9USYX847aPqun gO7DQHg1Gc0GDFiygxggfbNeRQ0li5aIZOOTgheWcJO7EIVAjqvcon1ABsY8Kmdz ZxGX5IDv7hVY6U69s2iWRmNVJBL0mvkJo/7X5CsFSUtN6VfWLHsVl7BYntEdqZVQ w7dNK3tqSlgU/Pjd5QKDp7RTNbLze/xZPuTDrZugVeVIaIJwoZXlb9K/P7ngsNuE TBWSYnOxWfMkAniW6BIGcCc0F+jHrjsDRtCbHt3fBf+2hIYlmlYvJupYv0LGWl+3 ny1o6kKih0Xq4KaUiiFF0CL6pe2+FBwydtkhSmHsVy/q8g63kobGvdiJl1B7UDpu xapPCGI+1x+21kLl7qG/PvKJfXQ5YCFlLbbCL15KjUCLwtzW2Ho= =vFzW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JLElgrE3zW7o3WpY--