Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <alex.mizrahi@gmail.com>) id 1YzC8P-0005ix-EB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:55:13 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.172; envelope-from=alex.mizrahi@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f172.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YzC8O-0000cu-OU for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:55:13 +0000 Received: by wibut5 with SMTP id ut5so23691695wib.1 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Sun, 31 May 2015 15:55:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.231.4 with SMTP id tc4mr15455812wic.27.1433112906786; Sun, 31 May 2015 15:55:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.102.73 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 15:55:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T2hfpts5y_M6PdDcxmq9Q2smesJ0Nmp9a9iyPD_MoPC9g@mail.gmail.com> References: <554BE0E1.5030001@bluematt.me> <CAFzgq-xByQ1E_33_m3UpXQFUkGc78HKnA=7XXMshANDuTkNsvA@mail.gmail.com> <CABsx9T0kbRe31LMwk499MQUw225f5GGd67GfhXBezHmDqxkioA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFzgq-z5WCznGhbOexS0XESNGAVauw45ewEV-1eMij7yDT61=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFzgq-zTybEQyGz0nq90u5n5JZcJzxQS_XKaTpr5POJi-tHM6A@mail.gmail.com> <CABsx9T2L5bi-c63-KqSifOMeNayUWSPo0_Hx8VjMR_4=kC3ixg@mail.gmail.com> <CAE28kUT61qYxqV0mOqw5Dan=eMiCvnG2SnsAeWzOWTxwLydyeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABsx9T2hfpts5y_M6PdDcxmq9Q2smesJ0Nmp9a9iyPD_MoPC9g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 01:55:06 +0300 Message-ID: <CAE28kUTZV3YsaSCX2d5YwLetnf=f+bOWGrwxLXdZFywTZ=+Pjg@mail.gmail.com> From: Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizrahi@gmail.com> To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134cc28bb6c1f0517689918 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (alex.mizrahi[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YzC8O-0000cu-OU Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 22:55:13 -0000 --001a1134cc28bb6c1f0517689918 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Yes, if you are on a slow network then you are at a (slight) disadvantage. > So? > Chun mentioned that his pool is on a slow network, and thus bigger blocks give it an disadvantage. (Orphan rate is proportional to block size.) You said that no, on contrary those who make big blocks have a disadvantage. And now you say that yes, this disadvantage exist. Did you just lie to Chun? --001a1134cc28bb6c1f0517689918 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo= ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c= cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div= class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><div class=3D"h5"><div><span style=3D"color:rgb= (34,34,34)">Yes, if you are on a slow network then you are at a (slight) di= sadvantage. So?</span></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div= ><br></div><div>Chun mentioned that his pool is on a slow network, and thus= bigger blocks give it an disadvantage. (Orphan rate is proportional to blo= ck size.)</div><div>You said that no, on contrary those who make big blocks= have a disadvantage.</div><div>And now you say that yes, this disadvantage= exist.</div><div><br></div><div>Did you just lie to Chun?</div><div><br></= div></div></div></div> --001a1134cc28bb6c1f0517689918--