Message-ID: <530BC94D.3030301@monetize.io>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:35:57 -0800
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>
Organization: Monetize.io Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <449F9E79-7B1B-4821-93C3-F1DC1B5B1DEA@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <449F9E79-7B1B-4821-93C3-F1DC1B5B1DEA@bitsofproof.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9
Precedence: list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

OP_RETURN outputs are provably unspendable *and* not included in the
UTXO set, so they're not dust (the client makes this check and handles
TX_NULL_DATA outputs separately).

On 02/24/2014 10:13 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote:
> It costs at least 5430 satoshis to create an output at the moment.
>  Is the same spam limit applied if the script is OP_RETURN? If not,
> I would be concerned od opening a cheap spam.
> 
> Tamas Blummer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=6Jux
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----