Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:26:03 -0700
Sender: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of apoelstra@wpsoftware.net designates 66.183.0.127 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.183.0.127;
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 23:33:29 +0000
From: Andrew Poelstra <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net>
To: Bitcoin Development Mailing List <bitcoindev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay
  Policies via User-Defined Scripts
Message-ID: <aNXRSd7ygh6NqE1V@mail.wpsoftware.net>
References: <cbdab6fa-93bc-44c9-80f0-6c68c6554f56n@googlegroups.com>
 <CAAS2fgRFP+BJUZR7h01=7=qamD5qEW6OYJikTMR=5RkxTCEMZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <de4dae19-86f4-4d7a-a895-b48664babbfcn@googlegroups.com>
 <CAAS2fgRABqRe1j6xzW0uhVrDiQnL6x1X6ALzfsJ7w4GztWVeNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAANnUxBTRzE1PLe9oJU_ukmp3a_y799W_7Ez4rOUOYPhdu26A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Z+AB30+IYQdrchqb"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAANnUxBTRzE1PLe9oJU_ukmp3a_y799W_7Ez4rOUOYPhdu26A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bitcoindev@googlegroups.com; contact bitcoindev+owners@googlegroups.com


--Z+AB30+IYQdrchqb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 11:52:02AM -0600, Chris Guida wrote:
> 
> Anyway, forcing users to relay transactions they consider abusive if they
> want to relay any transactions at all does not seem in keeping with
> bitcoin's ethos, not to mention that it obviously would never work.
>

Once a transaction is in a block, you need to relay the transaction if
you want to relay a block. You cannot pick and choose which parts of a
block you like and which parts are "abusive". This is what it means for
something to be a consensus system.

The purpose of the mempool is to approximate the contents of blocks,
both to help individual node operators (who would otherwise get large
quantities of "surprise transactions" with every block) and to help the
network (which would otherwise have poor propagation properties).

Any sort of filtering beyond that done by miners is contrary to this
purpose of the mempool. This is a technical fact. It has nothing to do
with "bitcoin's ethos", except its ethos as a consensus system, which
directly contradicts your point.

-- 
Andrew Poelstra
Director, Blockstream Research
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web:   https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew

The sun is always shining in space
    -Justin Lewis-Webster

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/aNXRSd7ygh6NqE1V%40mail.wpsoftware.net.

--Z+AB30+IYQdrchqb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEkPnKPD7Je+ki35VexYjWPOQbl8EFAmjV0UcACgkQxYjWPOQb
l8Ffjgf+NNX7+zzdyTYBW8l9k+qR9L7bwRVo1eLa4LtspFG3a4R4FGTFbbWE3H5W
FH52MS6+Snwzi/22Cly+Aoon7j588okaw6ynkOFcT2/z7pHKPxLckNoF41p5clmr
yx2Ono/NkOOXgsYk7CBE90b9ar4dHaBUw9RosaQIa0rsNnAqa86+ufp86Vzgx6lK
GuLPODzZwYHSxA9lho3gTCmwjvpC3gJSvoLeDoEqTPhjn/JKQd2FMiZ4AN9Z09N7
GKk2BmNAqYeI7Skbs78DeZEeO8iFJ7XnRp380KGoUKzLKUdaSTiwpIt8Owrj+KaH
J+BRI2Bht7/nDF3OKiinnTVEoM2Y6A==
=6s8b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Z+AB30+IYQdrchqb--