Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.223.178 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.223.178; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ie0-f178.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJDY6c2-fjbL=JcrF3umM4ji8Y5j5ppxX_mAzZdTh1_QRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEz79PrAg=yydd3UOk51wGQUWey-KZHUH1Npzwb=qL+6zTj+pQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<53581D1D.1000709@gmail.com>
	<CAEz79Poy0XEVyC=nOdhYNVOASvfB-2zHJcjU2hvjA7iDWGDDyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgSQ6rh1XKao6pv8BmpeRbtqWfUOVF+C1Fi3LEzY1YcPiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+s+GJDY6c2-fjbL=JcrF3umM4ji8Y5j5ppxX_mAzZdTh1_QRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:07:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJAtGRQWKw9tL=CdN48qa7LPKCfdzisyKj7x6YmZ+5M+FQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: kristovatlas@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2
Precedence: list

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If you are
> > Another option: Instead of statically building it'd be easy enough to
> build against the 4.6 Qt headers instead without even swapping the
> library. Qt is, after all, forward-compatible - between the 4.x
> versions. This will lose some GUI features but if compatibility is
> more important here that's a choice that can be made.

Are you sure this is Qt 4.6 at all? Not Qt 4.7?

I'd expect *much* more symbols if this was a Qt 4.8 versus 4.6
conflict. Qt 4.7 introduced a lot of new things (see all the
occurences of  #if QT_VERSION >= 0x040700 - things like
setPlaceHolderText would be expected to pop up too), but 4.8 did not.

Can you check?

Wladimir