Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of zikula.org
	designates 74.125.82.174 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.174; envelope-from=drak@zikula.org;
	helo=mail-we0-f174.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgT2x3iLnRiLabPT28eO6rbGuBBgi2s-Yhtgwo+3XWq7+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <52A3C8A5.7010606@gmail.com>
	<1795f3067ba3fcdd0caf978cc59ff024.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net>
	<52A435EA.7090405@gmail.com> <201312081237.24473.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CANAnSg2OrmQAcZ+cZdtQeADicH3U29QOgYPfP1AQhOMP6+P1wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgR0khyJxmz9c2Oc87hOFgiNuiPJuaeugGajdo_EcKEW9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3+AowZZS1=hAkx0KODiT-vbcRKyZaHOE2CWaJk3y5-Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgT2x3iLnRiLabPT28eO6rbGuBBgi2s-Yhtgwo+3XWq7+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Drak <drak@zikula.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:51:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CANAnSg3GeLPyXXK5Osg1hcC7MQ=Na3BWrGCe95ab7UcbeG2Jgw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3bac6f0c71d304ed0c0b7a
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org,
	your thoughts?
Precedence: list

--e89a8f3bac6f0c71d304ed0c0b7a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 8 December 2013 20:40, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
> > Right now I think Sirius still owns DNS for bitcoin.org which is
> nonsense.
> > He needs to pass it on to someone who is actually still involved with the
> > project. Again, the most obvious neutral candidate would be the
> Foundation.
>
> I am opposed to Bitcoin Foundation having control of Bitcoin.org, and
> I think it would be foolish of the foundation to accept it were it
> offered.
>

What do you suggest though? We will need to trust someone (even in a group
each person can act autonomously).
The only thing I can suggest would be to hand the keys to the bitcoin
project lead.

Otherwise, who has admin rights to the code projects
(github/sourceforge/this mailing list)? Those people have proven they can
be trusted so far.

Drak

--e89a8f3bac6f0c71d304ed0c0b7a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 8=
 December 2013 20:40, Gregory Maxwell <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mail=
to:gmaxwell@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gmaxwell@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> =
wrote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"im">On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:=
28 PM, Mike Hearn &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net">mike@plan99.net</a=
>&gt; wrote:<br>


&gt; Right now I think Sirius still owns DNS for <a href=3D"http://bitcoin.=
org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin.org</a> which is nonsense.<br>
&gt; He needs to pass it on to someone who is actually still involved with =
the<br>
&gt; project. Again, the most obvious neutral candidate would be the Founda=
tion.<br>
<br>
</div>I am opposed to Bitcoin Foundation having control of Bitcoin.org, and=
<br>
I think it would be foolish of the foundation to accept it were it<br>
offered.<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">What do you suggest=
 though? We will need to trust someone (even in a group each person can act=
 autonomously).</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">The only thing I can sugges=
t would be to hand the keys to the bitcoin project lead.</div>

<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">Otherwise, =
who has admin rights to the code projects (github/sourceforge/this mailing =
list)? Those people have proven they can be trusted so far.</div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra">

<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">Drak</div></div>

--e89a8f3bac6f0c71d304ed0c0b7a--