Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1QmDCl-0006K2-1x
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:07:55 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
	designates 208.79.240.5 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=208.79.240.5; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me;
	helo=smtpauth.rollernet.us; 
Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us ([208.79.240.5])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1QmDCj-0004e3-Tv
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:07:55 +0000
Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8270559401F
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bluematt.me (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:2:20c:29ff:fe16:f239])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: @bluematt.me)
	by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:2c0:caff:fe33:858b] (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:2c0:caff:fe33:858b])
	by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95AB4994
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:07:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T1667dxUj_iRtgbUR0ymBVOaADkGQU_CMF7z7e1-ctRcQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T3W=n6VVJfOUqcd52oYvd-5hSwdOJudtVHK4g0bPGpXew@mail.gmail.com>
	<1311765274.9830.3.camel@mei>
	<CAJNQ0su9Qbi=zMaJA0G77UuHkXBy8k7YLBd4cec=Rc_-FGPBjA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201107271028.28057.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAJ1JLtuuUUmrWGScbvYikAY_FOQhWpX5bt1NGp8VkpHk-hHOsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1311786944.9830.77.camel@mei>
	<CABsx9T1667dxUj_iRtgbUR0ymBVOaADkGQU_CMF7z7e1-ctRcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-uu8Xd32VaEwKA7WJIbhY"
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:07:39 +0200
Message-ID: <1311808059.2294.55.camel@Desktop666>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
X-Rollernet-Abuse: Processed by Roller Network Mail Services. Contact
	abuse@rollernet.us to report violations. Abuse policy:
	http://rollernet.us/abuse.php
X-Rollernet-Submit: Submit ID 5196.4e309a34.33cbe.0
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1QmDCj-0004e3-Tv
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Seeking advice: Encouraging bug-fixing
 over new features
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:07:55 -0000


--=-uu8Xd32VaEwKA7WJIbhY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 08:45 +1000, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> "A couple of bitcoins to fix a bug" sounds to me like nothing but
> trouble for whoever is in charge of awarding the bounties, but maybe
> I'm just anti-bounty because spending 2 or 3 hours and getting $30
> worth of bitcoins for fixing a bug wouldn't motivate me.

I do think it would motivate some people to fix a bug or two, though I
would say it wouldn't encourage long-term contributors, just a bunch of
hacked together patches which "fix" a bug.

> RE: road-map and bug-fix-only-releases:  Great ideas.
I know jgarzik hates the idea of branching for releases, but quite a few
projects do that, and it seems to work fairly well.  I would support the
idea of starting with 0.4 and branching for bugfixes to an 0.4 branch,
then adding new features to a head branch to be eventually called 0.5.
>=20
>=20
> RE: paid full-time project lead:  I arranged to get paid to work on
> bitcoin full-time before I left for Australia; more details when I get
> back week-after-next.
Awesome.


--=-uu8Xd32VaEwKA7WJIbhY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=s5aX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-uu8Xd32VaEwKA7WJIbhY--