Return-Path: <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27EFBB19
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:40:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
	[209.85.212.174])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B14C16A
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:40:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicja10 with SMTP id ja10so74164228wic.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=PwkfOmSGiGYZfI9yXD3F/O5h56Wkni51UbDjDABSYt4=;
	b=Mw4Vjxc4yjU0OKVXe+zq3RbsWVwdaOFnc5ciLg+QnIukF2eOtweZ0w788wQJTqxWqE
	teU1y53MbZKd9XVUk7ixqgHsp17SK+9vE2uLUfJJx5GGbDwYr3de2386BQ6e8DuL64kx
	t2c+8/Do1n+xpyjizUnzC4SqNIqOSI9ahsjjMgXpaW5lL1AnnC2RuTA6t3faoMnuxDJ6
	KwskvCFTgrGMz3bDQOCF70iz77AS1RwgKNOD2oisN77F7tUWBIiFjbznbfNtiMJM3D0t
	agCQysaa8SIFa0oy4fugcxbw/NibmNTzf/9w9YkYAUTDY673uc5QkWHLpwCF8POVlLWm
	AdDA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.238.39 with SMTP id vh7mr39471452wjc.109.1440427241986; 
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.52.84 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADToNK93kmXjwSAxj3WcPSYgq2uReVNJSpX1a5M7DMzgjgv5vA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADToNK93kmXjwSAxj3WcPSYgq2uReVNJSpX1a5M7DMzgjgv5vA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:40:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CADm_WcbEhMNWKCY6CqsSTRQztTz3Ap8PMkO+csz+jptc9Nbazg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
To: Andrew C <achow101@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141aa1a1560a3051e0f9a9e
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Questiosn about BIP100
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:40:44 -0000

--089e0141aa1a1560a3051e0f9a9e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Great questions.

- Currently working on technical BIP draft and implementation, hopefully
for ScalingBitcoin.org.  Only the PDF is publicly available as of today.
- Yes, the initial deployment is in the same manner as size votes.


On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Andrew C via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Is there any client or code that currently implements BIP 100? And how
> will it be deployed? WIll the initial fork be deployed in the same manner
> that the max block size changes are deployed described in the bip?
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>

--089e0141aa1a1560a3051e0f9a9e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Great questions.</div><div><br></div><div>- Currently=
 working on technical BIP draft and implementation, hopefully for ScalingBi=
tcoin.org.=C2=A0 Only the PDF is publicly available as of today.</div><div>=
- Yes, the initial deployment is in the same manner as size votes.</div><di=
v><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"=
>On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Andrew C via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr=
">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_b=
lank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><block=
quote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc=
 solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hi all,<div><br></div><div>Is the=
re any client or code that currently implements BIP 100? And how will it be=
 deployed? WIll the initial fork be deployed in the same manner that the ma=
x block size changes are deployed described in the bip?</div><div><br></div=
><div>Thanks</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--089e0141aa1a1560a3051e0f9a9e--