Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of domob.eu
	designates 92.222.9.28 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=92.222.9.28; envelope-from=d@domob.eu;
	helo=mail.domob.eu; 
Message-ID: <55647F02.5080308@domob.eu>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:11:14 +0200
From: Daniel Kraft <d@domob.eu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Florian Tschorsch <tschorsch@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
References: <55647AFB.3000909@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <55647AFB.3000909@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
OpenPGP: id=A7330737
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="4xXprlpfC7I6cBe27hT5sc2CpX1iC2foD"
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Survey Paper
Precedence: list

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--4xXprlpfC7I6cBe27hT5sc2CpX1iC2foD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Florian!

On 2015-05-26 15:54, Florian Tschorsch wrote:
> some time ago, we became interested in Bitcoin, but gathering relevant
> work and getting an overview was kind of painful. We took it as a sign
> that a survey paper on Bitcoin is desperately needed.
>=20
> Since then we observed the activities of the Bitcoin community. Recentl=
y
> we finished a technical report that is our attempt to contribute the
> lacking Bitcoin survey. Maybe it will be of interest to some of you:
> https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/464

Thanks for the work you (and your collegue) put into this paper!  It is
definitely a good step in the right direction!

> Feedback is highly appreciated and would help to improve the quality of=

> future revisions.

Do you know [1]?  I've only glanced at both papers, but it seems that's
also a research paper about Bitcoin & co.

  [1] http://www.jbonneau.com/doc/BMCNKF15-IEEESP-bitcoin.pdf

Apart from that, let me advertise myself a little bit. ;)  In case you
are interested in the difficulty mechanism (which you only mention
briefly), I've recently written about it [2] (official publication) [3]
(preprint without paywall).

  [2] http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12083-015-0347-x
  [3] http://www.domob.eu/research/DifficultyControl.pdf

Good luck with your further research!

Yours,
Daniel

--=20
http://www.domob.eu/
OpenPGP: 1142 850E 6DFF 65BA 63D6  88A8 B249 2AC4 A733 0737
Namecoin: id/domob -> https://nameid.org/?name=3Ddomob
--
Done:  Arc-Bar-Cav-Hea-Kni-Ran-Rog-Sam-Tou-Val-Wiz
To go: Mon-Pri


--4xXprlpfC7I6cBe27hT5sc2CpX1iC2foD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
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=KhvZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4xXprlpfC7I6cBe27hT5sc2CpX1iC2foD--