MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5944A0DB-DFE9-4D30-9049-AD38F37E3756@bitsofproof.com>
References: <CABm2gDo_sYjNWU6EEsKmOXt5uUu87Lj1oFzqio79MxSx2SYrNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DE7601.4070509@voskuil.org>
	<CABm2gDpt60B=Sf_2X9xt4fPH7x4fff7K4h36XfosHigV5tP+4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DF07A5.1060004@voskuil.org>
	<CABm2gDoS+XOR7Ugt91kNWNdvwsb1_Zb-aO0sma_Xps2Sx-0N5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DF2E80.5060506@voskuil.org>
	<20150214131320.GA26731@savin.petertodd.org>
	<3D4F2E23-CADE-4FE7-B960-3F79815E868C@bitsofproof.com>
	<20150215170228.GB21269@savin.petertodd.org>
	<E0CB8E24-C67D-48B1-8D9F-2B71BAF13446@bitsofproof.com>
	<20150219033205.GS14804@nl.grid.coop>
	<065C5F2E-FC1D-4994-A39A-9125D663FC71@petertodd.org>
	<EEF57CF9-5AFC-465B-ABA7-1B53118D6A5E@bitsofproof.com>
	<CABaSBawRXzeoHEvVBJK_JpvrtZq6tzhASRf3JLsz=skbrMq1QA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5944A0DB-DFE9-4D30-9049-AD38F37E3756@bitsofproof.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:16:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CABm2gDqk0GbzWV-J1ZqTgeSpruiq=sxTmt6bquJ406WNDaiVrA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re:
 [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Precedence: list

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Second, I think that squeezing all possible language bindings into a project is also unproductive.
>
> The language binding would be an independent and separately hosted project only using the C interface of the libconsensus library.

He didn't said "a project for all possible language bindings", just
java bindings. Other languages' bindings would be separate projects.