Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDCD9B78 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:26:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B1C431 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id t196so22611718iof.0 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:26:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Lka2Tqyhfs8IRqKG9t53WdL2eeqiRbptpXR8/HPQ0tA=; b=HDkcJ5VVedoSM9P/KvCxtudoO+s1psVKoOz+v4HjU2NlDxHR3dT8uEQbt2JTxi93XH sr4nIF1dpJiX+xrmT3/vobkf/edCkIZUMgHHyvqDlTslg7n5nbCoxtRQu88tgZ6yEmfJ HNhPuCTHDTXOBgKfaBKpNCsnb4cU/Ij/McqiDtr1X3J0bwe5FviYkRdKelrlSkvLTqyj Wxqmd7n05tcexb6yaP4O55Bmy3tWyD0qQJmemtJFOjLPzHrxoFxBVt+Fmk30JhLgME6y PwgzdxJdu6xr55LTVecdrTSvSw47SKlUn8KP//uwA0yn+LZJS7hX/Og4lZ7LRoDK/2uC bb6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=Lka2Tqyhfs8IRqKG9t53WdL2eeqiRbptpXR8/HPQ0tA=; b=bsFwzj2MGjznuYuNnFc1v+FrEZjTPAUtPTs8ydAAFRkA4gP71OQD7Dwz4Q5HC2XlSh 4fw/XpFt/bediaH7hW/Lb1pXJAjgjAhwm4fgcPW7aVofeOGQJQnimWdfuD4CooV0+M/c sO8i7UtWhGuE5GgzZQ9HYfX/p2ZEs6axmZwikxXJsQsNMap8CNpmmW5Dn4vA/ImfNrMj CzXiPEV5ClUR/vioAA17SvktSid5RFELvRtC3TvMzRHU9cAopaQvo5hMF8mPQw5vce3g MB4MWAAOizLkCsXsgypEUUVpiYFvGTkT8uYU2Eif8X//0Na0PNcdBBnyTR/TJ2ItO25I /Ozw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJCHtccozQ84NEHbpc5lkSj+UEpMKjcXZoYx9u5xAFpoPUEDtlz +K/D9VvBtHOuBAOLFWIifuGAP6SQhkBkioWUEwB6UA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosk0jIuhD9w76Amnp8QkOHLiWij5tRI9vXOUgg09bkmDy16Jrc6ezw4JFcohVRE5TtGwsjQJHynkDH3LpCUewE= X-Received: by 10.107.12.156 with SMTP id 28mr6360483iom.94.1513895186388; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:26:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.31.141 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:26:25 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: DKBryant@gmail.com From: Dan Bryant Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 16:26:25 -0600 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ee03acfde200560e13011" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:31:08 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for Legacy Sign Verify functions X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:26:27 -0000 --001a113ee03acfde200560e13011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" https://github.com/brianddk/bips/blob/legacysignverify/bip-0xyz.mediawiki Although this is a well established functionality, it has never been published in a BIP. My proposal is simply to provide a reference point for future expansion of these capabilities into new address schemes. Original reference thread [Sign / Verify message against SegWit P2SH addresses] --001a113ee03acfde200560e13011 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Although this is a well established= functionality, it has never been published in a BIP.=C2=A0 My proposal is = simply to provide a reference point for future expansion of these capabilit= ies into new address schemes.

Original reference thread = [Sign / Verify message against SegWit P2SH addresses]
--001a113ee03acfde200560e13011--